Did You See This? Some Laid Off State Department Staffer Left This Note....
So, That's How That Judge Who Shut Down ICE Raids in Southern CA...
Things Got Very Heated Between Sen. Kennedy and This Anti-Trump Clown
Now They Care? Democrats Suddenly Get Loud About Epstein Files After Four Years...
DOJ Drops Bombshell Report on Federal Prisons—The Details Are Quite Disturbing
The Media Recalibrates Gavin Newsom's Pot Farm/Child Care Program, and Global Warming Gets...
Total Authorization
DHS Shreds NYT’s False Claims Regarding Texas Floods
Bernie Sanders Finally Gets Some Commonsense
Newsom Claims He's 'Not Anti-Gun,' but His Record Tells a Different Story
Political Analyst Warns NYC: Socialist Zohran Mamdani Poised to Win
One Final Push Could End the Mullahs Regime in Iran
UPDATE: Kash Patel Says He’s Not Going Anywhere
LA Offers Free Cash to Illegal Aliens Afraid to Leave Their Homes Amid...
Put on Notice: Trump Authorizes ICE, Border Patrol to Arrest 'Slimeballs' Attacking Office...
Tipsheet

Second Amendment Win: Federal Judge Blocks Illinois Ban on Some Semi-Automatic Rifles, Magazines

AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty, File

A federal judge in Illinois has temporarily blocked enforcement of a ban on some semi-automatic rifles and large capacity magazines, ruling that there is a “reasonable likelihood” that multiple plaintiffs who have sued will be successful in their argument that the law violates their Second Amendment rights. 

Advertisement

The law, known as the Protect Illinois Communities Act (PICA), was passed after the mass shooting in Highland Park last year, where a gunman opened fire at an Independence Day parade, killing seven and injuring dozens of others. 

“Can the senseless crimes of a relative few be so despicable to justify the infringement of the constitutional rights of law-abiding individuals in hopes that such crimes will then abate or, at least, not be as horrific? More specifically, can PICA be harmonized with the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and with Bruen? That is the issue before this Court. The simple answer at this stage in the proceedings is ‘likely no,’” U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn said in the ruling. "The Supreme Court in Bruen and Heller held that citizens have a constitutional right to own and possess firearms and may use them for self-defense. PICA seems to be written in spite of the clear directives in Bruen and Heller, not in conformity with them."

McGlynn also pointed to other means available for addressing gun violence. 

"There is a wide array of civil and criminal laws that permit the commitment and prosecution of those who use or may use firearms to commit crimes," he said. "Law enforcement and prosecutors should take their obligations to enforce these laws seriously. Families and the public at large should report concerning behavior. Judges should exercise their prudent judgment in committing individuals that pose a threat to the public and imposing sentences that punish, not just lightly inconvenience, those guilty of firearm-related crimes."

Advertisement

The decision handed down Friday came days after another federal judge in the Northern District of Illinois rejected a request to block the law.

Responding to the ruling, Attorney General Kwame Raoul's office said it will file an appeal.  “We…remain committed to defending the constitutionality of the Protect Illinois Communities Act."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement