Debbie Wasserman Schultz Claimed She Got a Black Voter Group's Endorsement. Here's the...
About That ICE-Involved Shooting in Maine...
Look at This CNN Host's Face When Trump Dropped This Line During a...
Footage of Ro Khanna's 'Violent' West Bank Detention Released. Notice Anything Wrong?
GOP Enters Treacherous Legislative Waters Without a Key US Senator
Mamdani Isn't Giving Up on Damaged Top Advisor Morris Katz
Wait, That’s How Many Messages the Secret Service Missed Regarding Trump's Would-be Assass...
Grandfather Recovering After Scary Encounter With a Yellowstone Bison
June Inflation Report Crushes ‘Experts’ Predictions, Biggest Win in Over Five Years
While Abdul El-Sayed Pushes for Socialized Medicine, His Psychiatrist Wife Won't Accept An...
Adam Kinzinger's Post on Lindsey Graham's Passing Is As Despicable As You'd Expect
Lefties Fleeing Red States Are Draining Seattle's 'Transgender' Nonprofits
NYC Is Going to Lose Billions Thanks to Mamdani's Tax-the-Rich Scheme
Jew Are You?
President Trump Officially Informed Congress That the War Against Iran Has Resumed
Tipsheet

Pulitzer Prize-Winning Journalist Has an Explanation for That NYT Report on Nord Stream Sabotage

Pulitzer Prize-Winning Journalist Has an Explanation for That NYT Report on Nord Stream Sabotage
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

About a month after Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh dropped a bombshell report alleging the Biden administration was behind the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines, The New York Times came out with its own scoop suggesting a pro-Ukrainian group carried out the attack, according to U.S. officials.

Advertisement

The timing of the release was not lost on foreign policy wonks, coming just days after German Chancellor Olaf Scholz visited Washington. 

Now, Hersh claims U.S. and German intelligence agencies ‘fed’ the Times and Germany’s Die Zeit that “false cover story to counter the report.” 

In early March, President Biden hosted German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Washington. The trip included only two public events—a brief pro forma exchange of compliments between Biden and Scholz before the White House press corps, with no questions allowed; and a CNN interview with Scholz by Fareed Zakaria, who did not touch on the pipeline allegations. The chancellor had flown to Washington with no members of the German press on board, no formal dinner scheduled, and the two world leaders were not slated to conduct a press conference, as routinely happens at such high-profile meetings. Instead, it was later reported that Biden and Scholz had an 80-minute meeting, with no aides present for much of the time. There have been no statements or written understandings made public since then by either government, but I was told by someone with access to diplomatic intelligence that there was a discussion of the pipeline exposé and, as a result, certain elements in the Central Intelligence Agency were asked to prepare a cover story in collaboration with German intelligence that would provide the American and German press with an alternative version for the destruction of Nord Stream 2. In the words of the intelligence community, the agency was “to pulse the system” in an effort to discount the claim that Biden had ordered the pipelines’ destruction. (Seymour Hersh)

Advertisement

Despite the Biden administration denouncing Hersh's initial reporting as "completely and utterly false," the journalist continues to stand by his work. 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement