Support Democrats’ Right to Speak Freely and Make Damn Fools of Themselves
Comedy Always Evolves, and Colbert Almost Killed It
John Brennan Plays the 'Nazi Card' While FBI Turns Up the Heat
Remember the McCloskeys? The Government Finally Gave Back What it Stole From Them.
The VP Harris Post-Mortem on Stephen Colbert (Yes, Kamala, the System Worked)
Trump’s Tariff Triumph
The Biggest Losetit
It’s Time for Independence for Biafra Free From Nigerian Control
Democrats Are in Disastrous Shape As Midterms Loom
Has Pressure on Advertisers to Leave X Hurt the Right’s Only Major Free...
Understanding Transgender Surgery
Kash Patel Uncovers Burn Bags and Buried Truths, Deep State Scrambles to Hide...
Democrat Calls Lawbreakers 'Long-Term Residents' in Stunning Display of Border Amnesia
America First, Big Pharma Last: Trump Orders Drug Prices Slashed to Lowest Global...
California Homeowners Take Up Arms as Crime Surges Under Newsom, Bass
Tipsheet
Premium

Bipartisan Group of Lawmakers Blast USDA's Proposed Cuts to WIC

Allen Breed

The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, also known as WIC, provides states with grants for food, health care referrals, and nutrition education for low-income mothers, babies, and young children who are at nutritional risk. That's why a new proposal from the U.S. Department of Agriculture that would affect this nutrition security safety net is raising bipartisan alarm. 

In November, USDA announced the proposed rule, which would reduce the amount of dairy "provided in all child, pregnant, postpartum, and breastfeeding participant food packages" and add "substitutions for milk" like "soy-based" yogurt and cheeses. 

In a bipartisan letter to USDA Secretary Thomas Vilsack, GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York, Democrat Rep. Josh Harder of California and dozens of other lawmakers expressed their "deep concerns" about the proposed rule, which they argue "will have unintended and significant negative effects on the health of WIC participants." 

As the lawmakers state in the letter, the proposed rule would reduce the current maximum monthly allowance for milk to 12 quarts for 12-to-24-month-old children, down from 16 quarts. For 2-4-year-olds, it would be reduced to 14 quarts, down from 16 quarts, while for pregnant and partially breastfeeding moms, it would be reduced to 16 quarts, down from 22 quarts. 

At the time the rule was proposed, USDA claimed the revisions were "science-based" and "incorporate recommendations from the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) and the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025." 

But lawmakers and industry leaders are objecting. 

"Dairy products provide nutrients that are vital to the health of infants, children, mothers, and expectant mothers," the lawmakers said. "We are greatly concerned that reducing dairy in WIC food packages will negatively impact the nutritional intakes and health of program participants, as it will decrease their access to dairy's nutrients at life stages key for health and development." 

The criticism was joined by Michael Dykes, president and CEO of International Dairy Foods Association.

"USDA's proposed cuts to WIC dairy benefits put low-income mothers and children at risk of losing access to critical nutrients at a time when food costs are a major challenge for families," he said. "USDA's proposal ignores its own federal Dietary Guidelines, which say 90 percent of Americans are not consuming enough dairy to meet daily requirements. USDA must not make these cuts and instead, find ways to improve program participation by encouraging the purchase of nutritious milk and dairy. IDFA is grateful to Reps. Stefanik and Harder and the bipartisan group of representatives calling on USDA to maintain the current WIC dairy allotments in the final rule." 


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement