Let’s Take Kamala Up on Her Proposal of ‘No Bad Ideas’
No One Trusts Public Health Experts Anymore, and It's All Their Fault
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 321: What Jesus Said About Food
Here Is What’s Wrong With the Republican Party
OK, So Why Do Jews Keep Voting For People Who Hate Them?
Democrat Crimes Need to Be Prosecuted, Pronto!
The RNC Just Scored a Major Election Security Victory in North Carolina
Mangione Superfan Who Celebrated Brian Thompson's Alleged Murder Is Daughter of CVS Health...
Marco Rubio Just Torched the Panicans Crying Over the Iran Peace Deal
Wait, This Democrat Candidate Refuses To Say the Pledge?
The Trump Administration Just Handed This Commie a Subpoena
God and the Jefferson Memorial
What Explains the Catastrophe of Seattle's Mayor Katie? Could Be Evolution
Science Is Making the Humanity of Unborn Babies Harder to Ignore
Mars Colonization and the Economic Future of SpaceX
Tipsheet

How WaPo Tried to Discredit Journalists Behind the Twitter Files With Just One Word

How WaPo Tried to Discredit Journalists Behind the Twitter Files With Just One Word
Manuel Balce Ceneta

The Washington Post took a subtle dig at independent journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weis for their work on the Twitter Files, exposing internal documents at the social media giant that have showed some of the most controversial decisions at the company prior to Elon Musk’s takeover.

Advertisement

In a report published Monday evening about the site’s Trust & Safety Council getting dissolved, WaPo labeled Taibbi and Weiss as “conservative journalists.”

"As head of trust and safety at Twitter, Roth was involved in many of the platform’s decisions about what posts to remove and what accounts to suspend. His communications with other Twitter officials have been posted in recent days as part of what Musk calls the Twitter Files, a series of tweets by conservative journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss," the Post story initially stated. 

Taibbi, a Substack writer, once covered politics for Rolling Stone and has described himself as “run-of-the-mill, old-school ACLU liberal.” Weiss, meanwhile, previously served as the opinion page editor at The New York Times. Neither is considered conservative, but as critics pointed out, that label has become a “smear” to discredit them and the work they’re doing. 

 

Advertisement

The Post eventually stealth edited the label after Fox News Digital asked about it, but no editor's note was issued indicating a correction took place. 

"That is hilarious," Taibbi told Fox about the Post's report. "Anyone who steps out of line in any way is labeled conservative or pro-Trump now. It's automatic and predictable."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement