The Decline and Fall of Our So-Called Degreed Experts
Brad Thor’s Edge of Honor: The Fictional Thriller That Feels One Headline Away
The End of Patriotism?
The Wannabe Political Assassins of Donald Trump
What the 12-Day War Hath Wrought
Independence Day Calls for the Governed to Protect Their 'Consent'
Happy Independence Day!
Thank God 'Everything Moves Through Memphis:' A Tribute to Fred Smith
Let Us Be Proud Again: Why America Deserves Our Patriotism
President Trump’s One Big, Beautiful Bill Act Strengthens, Not Slashes, Medicare and Medic...
What Do We Celebrate on July 4th? What Are We to Be Thankful...
Barack Obama and the Corruption of Independence Day
Washington’s Cross: The Retreat, the River, and the Republic
A Proud Immigrant’s Call to Celebrate Freedom on Independence Day
This Fourth of July Should Be a Rededication to the Ideals That Inspired...
Tipsheet

How WaPo Tried to Discredit Journalists Behind the Twitter Files With Just One Word

Manuel Balce Ceneta

The Washington Post took a subtle dig at independent journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weis for their work on the Twitter Files, exposing internal documents at the social media giant that have showed some of the most controversial decisions at the company prior to Elon Musk’s takeover.

Advertisement

In a report published Monday evening about the site’s Trust & Safety Council getting dissolved, WaPo labeled Taibbi and Weiss as “conservative journalists.”

"As head of trust and safety at Twitter, Roth was involved in many of the platform’s decisions about what posts to remove and what accounts to suspend. His communications with other Twitter officials have been posted in recent days as part of what Musk calls the Twitter Files, a series of tweets by conservative journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss," the Post story initially stated. 

Taibbi, a Substack writer, once covered politics for Rolling Stone and has described himself as “run-of-the-mill, old-school ACLU liberal.” Weiss, meanwhile, previously served as the opinion page editor at The New York Times. Neither is considered conservative, but as critics pointed out, that label has become a “smear” to discredit them and the work they’re doing. 

 

Advertisement

The Post eventually stealth edited the label after Fox News Digital asked about it, but no editor's note was issued indicating a correction took place. 

"That is hilarious," Taibbi told Fox about the Post's report. "Anyone who steps out of line in any way is labeled conservative or pro-Trump now. It's automatic and predictable."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement