Independent Reporter Highlights What's Fueling the Panic Over Trump's Tariffs
If That Was Kamala's Initial Reaction to Her 2024 Defeat, She Still Doesn't...
Did an Ohio Newspaper Crop Out a Black Republican?
Barack Obama Said What Now at a Recent College Event
Ex-MSNBC Host Reveals What's Really Damning About All These New Books About Biden
Ohio GOP: Follow Your Leader; Keep Coal Plants Open
Trump Administration Cleaning House at FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products
Ford Teams Up with Trump Admin to Drive Down Car Prices and Boost...
Texas Governor Issues Strong Warning Over Controversial 'Muslim City' Proposal
AOC Surges Ahead of Schumer in New York Primary Poll, Signaling Shift in...
George Clooney Erupts on MSNBC Producer After Mika Brzezinski Suggested Obama Influenced A...
Arizona Man Convicted in Hate-Fueled Plot to Target Christian Churches with Hoax Bomb...
Driving Healthier Behaviors and Outcomes in Children, Including at School
Ayatollah's New Year Message Forecasts Uprising
JFK: Two Gunmen But No Conspiracy
Tipsheet

Montana's Legislative Referendum 131 Headed for Failure, Shocking Conservatives

Greg Baker

Voters in Montana appear poised to reject a ballot measure that requires medical care for infants born alive, including in abortion. 

With 89 percent of the vote in, 52.6 percent oppose Legislative Referendum 131 to 47.4 percent who support it. 

Advertisement

According to the Montana Free Press, the measure caused confusion among voters during the campaign cycle over the conflicting ways the referendum was framed. 

Proponents said it would give persons born alive legal protections that entitles them to medical care so they are not left to die, while opponents said infanticide is already illegal in the state. Medical organizations rallied to oppose the measure, arguing it would criminalize healthcare providers for offering palliative care at the parents' request to infants who will not survive. 

Republican lawmakers who voted in favor of the measure have recently disputed those characterizations, saying that hospice care for dying infants would be allowed under the statute’s language.  

“It states health care providers must take ‘medically appropriate and reasonable actions to preserve the life and health of a born-alive infant.’ Hospice care is appropriate and it is disingenuous of the opposition to misconstrue and belittle the hospice line of health care,” said Rep. Matt Regier, R-Kalispell, who sponsored the bill to create the referendum, in a recent op-ed. “Medically appropriate and reasonable health care is the treatment you and I expect when we visit our medical provider. Why would we not afford this same care to infants?”

The text of the bill to put LR-131 on the ballot says it pertains to infants delivered “at any stage of development” by “natural or induced labor, cesarean section, induced abortion, or another method.” The bill defines “born alive” as an infant that “breathes, has a beating heart, or has definite movement of voluntary muscles,” and says physicians and other staff who do not provide life-sustaining treatment to newborns would face felony charges punishable by up to 20 years in prison and a $50,000 fine. (Montana Free Press)

Advertisement

Conservatives expressed their shock on social media. 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement