What’s Happening to the ‘Right to Try’?
This Bill Aims to Protect Children From Pornography – but There Might...
Why CNN Says Dems Are Garbage
Adieu and Good Riddance to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting
Kevin Brock. The Best of America's FBI
The Left and Losers
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 279: Moses in the New Testament – Book...
Our Federal Government Remains Bloated Beyond Belief
Desperate to Cling to Power, Mullah's Executioners Target Political Prisoners
Senate Officially Confirms Jeanine Pirro As U.S. Attorney for DC
Trump Says Market Fallout Is Only Reason He Hasn’t Fired Fed Chair Powell
How a USDA Employee and 5 Others Stole Millions From the Poor
Double Standard Exposed: MAGA Gear Banned at Public Events While Pride, Trans Flags...
Hochul Backs Socialist Zohran Mamdani on Affordability
Colorado Cops Punished for Helping ICE, As Sanctuary State Law Takes Priority Over...
Tipsheet
Premium

What's Going on With PayPal's $2,500 Fine? Lawmakers Are Demanding Answers.

Paul Sakuma

Earlier this month PayPal users were stunned to learn about a published policy indicating the company could fine users thousands of dollars for spreading “misinformation.” PayPal quickly retracted, claiming the notice “went out in error” and “included incorrect information.”

“PayPal is not fining people for misinformation and this language was never intended to be inserted in our policy,” the statement added. “Our teams are working to correct our policy pages. We’re sorry for the confusion this has caused.”

While that appeared to settle matters for now at least, questions are again being raised over a portion of PayPal's user agreement that includes a similar $2,500 fine. 

Today, the remaining language leaves users and elected officials demanding more clarity over how the platform defines fine-worthy speech.

A part of PayPal’s user agreement that says any customer in violation of the platform’s “acceptable use” policy is subject to a $2,500 fine has been in place since at least 2013, according to the website’s archive. The fine had largely gone unnoticed until earlier this month when PayPal updated its acceptable use policy to state that messages which are “fraudulent, promote misinformation or are unlawful” are in violation of the policy and, by extension, subject to the fine. The “acceptable use” policy stated that determinations of which messages violated the policy would be made at “PayPal’s sole discretion.” [...]

The note about misinformation was removed from the acceptable use terms, but the $2,500 penalty for violations remains, causing continued concern.

PayPal’s website still lists “provide false, inaccurate or misleading information” under the “restricted activities” portion of its policy. Violating the “restricted activities” portion does not result automatically in the $2,500 fine that breaching the “acceptable use” agreement does, but it may still result in charges, account suspension or other punitive actions. (Forbes)

Republicans have taken notice and are demanding answers. 


 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement