What Happened in Minneapolis Is Part of the Left's Plan
Here's the Other Viral Minnesota Video That Got Leftists Riled Up. It's a...
Was Border Patrol's Gregory Bovino Relieved of Command?
We Have a Pretty Big Mess in Minneapolis, but One Thing Has to...
Democrats Want Blood and They Aren’t Ever Going to Stop
Press Covers the Offensive Fashion Choices of ICE, and the Acceptable Sexism Toward...
The Wrong Narrative
A Once-in-a-Lifetime Teachable Moment
Holocaust Remembrance Day: Not Just Memory — A Call to Moral Courage
No Snow Day for NYC Kids
Sunday Morning Worship Should Not Require an Escape Plan
Protest, Aggression, and Self-Defense
How a Texas Judge Hurt Kids and Helped Big Tech
It Looks Like Budweiser Learned Their Lesson After This New Ad Dropped
The Antifa Crossdresser Who Urged Followers to Take Up Arms Against ICE Is...
Tipsheet

Hawley Grills Biden's Sentencing Commission Nominee Over 'Alarming' Position on Mandatory Minimums

Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) argued Joe Biden’s nominees are getting “more and more radical” after the president’s U.S. Sentencing Commission nominee refused to say whether she supports any mandatory minimums. 

Advertisement

Hawley asked Laura Mate, director of the Sentencing Resource Counsel Project in the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Arizona, about a 2013 letter she signed commenting on a proposal to the Sentencing Commission. 

Hawley pointed out the letter argued sentencing guidelines were too harsh for child porn offenders and that mandatory minimums should be abolished. 

He wanted to know if she still believed that.

She responded that the letter came from the defender view and she’d need to do more research to come up with an opinion now.

“I don’t have an opinion on that right now, senator. I would want to look at the data and get up to speed on where things are right now,” she said.

“You had an opinion in 2013, so now you’re saying you don’t have one?” Hawley wondered. 

“I’m saying that I would want to offer you an informed opinion and things change over time. That was a long time ago,” she replied. 

“Indeed, they do,” Hawley said. "You said a number of frankly alarming things in that letter including saying that you reject the view of some commissioners that a mandatory minimum penalty is ever needed, ever, or appropriate in child pornography cases, ever."

Advertisement

The senator told her point blank he couldn’t support her nomination. 

“I can’t possibly support your nomination. I can’t support the nomination of someone who wants to do away with mandatory minimums,” he said. “I think it’s a radical position, and I think, frankly, your nomination is indicative of where this administration is on its soft-on-crime policies.”


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement