Why the NYT Needed to Correct Their Article on Charlie Kirk
A Dem Rep Was Heard Saying How He Truly Felt About Charlie Kirk's...
Who's That Bearded Man Caught Cheering As Charlie Kirk Is Shot? He's Come...
Here's What Happened to Some Office Depot Staffers Who Refused to Print Charlie...
Carolina Panthers Staffer Fired After Trashing Charlie Kirk on Social Media
Jasmine Crockett Just Hit a New Low With Her Hot Take on Charlie...
Conservatives Must Continue Speaking Out, Even As the Left Demands We Censor 'Objectionabl...
Cenk Uygur Loses His Mind When Dave Rubin Reads His Own Words About...
Rolling Stone Tries to Reject the Cancel Culture They Once Believed Was Good...
Pete Hegseth Says Military Will Track and Discipline Service Members Who Mock or...
Ben Shapiro Has Two Words For Those Who Think Kirk's Assassination Will Silence...
White House Honors Charlie Kirk with Tribute Video Highlighting Faith and Patriotism
Charlie Kirk Assassin Lived With Transgender Partner
Erika Kirk Posts Heartbreaking Video Mourning Over Charlie’s Casket: 'I Love You'
Trump Demands NATO Cut Off Russia Oil, Threatens Major Sanctions and China Tariffs
Tipsheet

California Superior Court 'Eviscerates' Gender Quota Mandate for Corporate Boards

AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge struck down a law requiring publicly traded companies have female directors on their boards.

In the filing, Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis said, “S.B. 826’s goal was to achieve general equity or parity; its goal was not to boost California’s economy, not to improve opportunities for women in the workplace nor not to protect California taxpayers, public employees, pensions and retirees.” 

Advertisement

The law was signed in 2018 by then-Gov. Jerry Brown. 

The law required publicly held companies headquartered in California to have one member who identifies as a woman on their boards of directors by the end of 2019. By January 2022, boards with five directors were required to have two women and boards with six or more members were required to have three women.

The Women on Boards law, also known by its bill number, SB826, called for penalties ranging from $100,000 fines for failing to report board compositions to the California secretary of state’s office to $300,000 for multiple failures to have the required number of women board members.

Fewer than half the nearly 650 applicable corporations in the state reported last year that they had complied. More than half didn’t file the required disclosure statement, according to the most recent report. (NBC)

Duffy-Lewis also wrote that the state couldn't prove any corporation had actually discriminated against women.

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in 2019, arguing the quota “violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution.”

Advertisement

In a statement on Monday, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton praised the ruling.

“The Court eviscerated California’s unconstitutional gender quota mandate. This is the second California court decision finding that quotas for corporate boards are unconstitutional," Fitton said. "The radical Left’s unprecedented attacks on anti-discrimination law has suffered another stinging defeat. Thankfully, California courts have upheld the core American value of equal protection under the law."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement