James Talarico Still Can't Escape His Past
Ken Paxton Blasts James Talarico Over His Love for Taxes
Following a Bloody Weekend, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Touts City's Bizarre Emergency D...
After Letting the Homeless Freeze to Death, Mamdani Announces 'Extreme Heat' Executive Ord...
Acting AG Todd Blanche Announces Healthcare Fraud Charges Against Hundreds of Defendants
Scott Wiener Gets Dragged for Saying the Rainbow Is About 'Pride'
Despite Democrats' Best Efforts, Title IX Turns 54
Illegal Immigrant Busted After Using Uber Gig to Kidnap, Assault Passenger
After Smearing Elon Musk, Ro Khanna Is Desperately Trying to Avoid a Massive...
Algae Can Only Survive Off What Others Create—Just Like the Left
Iran Is Already Denying It Agreed to Nuclear Inspections
Trump Reveals Why He Isn't Worried About Releasing Frozen Iranian Funds
Tom Homan Levels Zohran Mamdani and DSA Candidate Over Their Fight to Abolish...
Guess Who Just Endorsed Graham Platner. The Irony Is Real.
MLB Commissioner Backs Off Warning to Giants Players Over 'Pride Night' Bible Verses
Tipsheet

California Superior Court 'Eviscerates' Gender Quota Mandate for Corporate Boards

California Superior Court 'Eviscerates' Gender Quota Mandate for Corporate Boards
AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge struck down a law requiring publicly traded companies have female directors on their boards.

In the filing, Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis said, “S.B. 826’s goal was to achieve general equity or parity; its goal was not to boost California’s economy, not to improve opportunities for women in the workplace nor not to protect California taxpayers, public employees, pensions and retirees.” 

Advertisement

The law was signed in 2018 by then-Gov. Jerry Brown. 

The law required publicly held companies headquartered in California to have one member who identifies as a woman on their boards of directors by the end of 2019. By January 2022, boards with five directors were required to have two women and boards with six or more members were required to have three women.

The Women on Boards law, also known by its bill number, SB826, called for penalties ranging from $100,000 fines for failing to report board compositions to the California secretary of state’s office to $300,000 for multiple failures to have the required number of women board members.

Fewer than half the nearly 650 applicable corporations in the state reported last year that they had complied. More than half didn’t file the required disclosure statement, according to the most recent report. (NBC)

Duffy-Lewis also wrote that the state couldn't prove any corporation had actually discriminated against women.

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in 2019, arguing the quota “violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution.”

Advertisement

Related:

CALIFORNIA WOKE WOMEN

In a statement on Monday, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton praised the ruling.

“The Court eviscerated California’s unconstitutional gender quota mandate. This is the second California court decision finding that quotas for corporate boards are unconstitutional," Fitton said. "The radical Left’s unprecedented attacks on anti-discrimination law has suffered another stinging defeat. Thankfully, California courts have upheld the core American value of equal protection under the law."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos