UPDATE: Trump Accepts Hamas' Claims of Acceptance on Gaza Peace Plan
There's an Update on That Secret Service Bust in New York
Hamas Just Made a Major Announcement on the Gaza War, But Will They...
Vote to Reopen the Government and End the Schumer Shutdown Fails
This App Helped a Shooter Target an ICE Facility – Now It's Gone
Hollywood Hates Censorship but Won't Act, The Atlantic Idiotically Compares Charlie Kirk t...
UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood Says She's 'Surprised' by Name of Manchester Synagogue...
Broadview Police Chief Ready to Tear Down Fence Around ICE Facility
Equity: Zohran Mamdani Will Eliminate Gifted Programs From NYC Schools
Harvard's Newest Visiting Professor Is Not Going to Help the University's Decline Into...
Sen. Eric Schmitt Shares Eye-Opening Thread on How 1970s Leftist Radicals Were Mainstreame...
U.S. Forces Strike Another Drug Trafficking Vessel Off the Coast of Venezuela
White House: America Engaged in ‘Non-International Armed Conflict’ With Narco-Terrorists
Coalition of GOP Lawmakers Press RFK Jr. to Fire FDA Bureaucrats Over Abortion...
Conservatives Slam Netflix for Creepy Kid Show
Tipsheet

California Superior Court 'Eviscerates' Gender Quota Mandate for Corporate Boards

AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge struck down a law requiring publicly traded companies have female directors on their boards.

In the filing, Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis said, “S.B. 826’s goal was to achieve general equity or parity; its goal was not to boost California’s economy, not to improve opportunities for women in the workplace nor not to protect California taxpayers, public employees, pensions and retirees.” 

Advertisement

The law was signed in 2018 by then-Gov. Jerry Brown. 

The law required publicly held companies headquartered in California to have one member who identifies as a woman on their boards of directors by the end of 2019. By January 2022, boards with five directors were required to have two women and boards with six or more members were required to have three women.

The Women on Boards law, also known by its bill number, SB826, called for penalties ranging from $100,000 fines for failing to report board compositions to the California secretary of state’s office to $300,000 for multiple failures to have the required number of women board members.

Fewer than half the nearly 650 applicable corporations in the state reported last year that they had complied. More than half didn’t file the required disclosure statement, according to the most recent report. (NBC)

Duffy-Lewis also wrote that the state couldn't prove any corporation had actually discriminated against women.

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in 2019, arguing the quota “violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution.”

Advertisement

In a statement on Monday, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton praised the ruling.

“The Court eviscerated California’s unconstitutional gender quota mandate. This is the second California court decision finding that quotas for corporate boards are unconstitutional," Fitton said. "The radical Left’s unprecedented attacks on anti-discrimination law has suffered another stinging defeat. Thankfully, California courts have upheld the core American value of equal protection under the law."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement