Why Are Male-Identifying Democrat Candidates All Creepy Weirdos?
Does This Dem Rep Know That Graham Platner Already Crossed His 'Red Line'...
Lefty Podcaster's Take on Graham Platner's Alleged Emotional Abuse Is Quite Something
Look at This CNN Host's Face When John Fetterman Said This About Graham...
After Scott Pelley Was Shown the Door, These CBS News Reporters Aren't Leaving
CA Elections Are a Total Disgrace
Scott Pelley's Answer to This Question Seems to Drive the Point Home That...
Ro Khanna Sees Graham Platner As the Nation's Path to 'Redemption'
Sky News Destroys U.K.'s Labour Party for Its Selective Outrage Over George Floyd...
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Calls for Federal Funding Cuts Until California Cleans Up...
A Suspect Is in Custody After Five New Yorkers Stabbed at Penn Station
Graham Platner's Vision for Our Elections Is Downright Bizarre
US Attorney Torches California Officials As They Continue to Block a Federal Audit...
Trump Has a Simple Message for Middle East After Weekend Conflict
America Argues About the Constitution It Doesn't Know
Tipsheet

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Democrats appear to have thrown in the towel on their plan to tax unrealized capital gains.

The tax, which was blasted as total "insanity," was expected to hit earners with $1 billion in assets or $100 million in income for three consecutive years, The Wall Street Journal reported in October. 

Advertisement

At the time, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the plan “would help get at capital gains, which are an extraordinarily large part of the incomes of the wealthiest individuals, and right now escape taxation, until they’re realized, and often they’re unrealized in the death benefit from a so-called step up of basis.”

The Heritage Foundation said the proposal was likely "an unconstitutional wealth tax," which, if passed, could force Treasury "to spend trillions of dollars without an adequate source of funding."

Article I, Sections 8 and 9 of the Constitution deny Congress the power to levy a direct tax unless it’s “apportioned among the several states” in proportion to population. That means that the tax must be spread evenly among every person in every state.

In Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust (1895), the Supreme Court held that a tax is direct if it’s “upon property holders in respect of their estates, whether real or personal, or of the income yielded by such estates, and the payment of which cannot be avoided.”

More recently, in NFIB v. Sebelius (2012), the court reaffirmed that taxes on personal property are direct taxes.

A tax on unrealized capital gains would be a direct tax because it’s a tax on personal property paid by someone who cannot—quoting the Pollock decision—“shift the burden upon some one [sic] else.” As a direct tax, Democrats’ proposed tax must be spread equally among the populations of the states to pass constitutional muster, but it isn’t. (The Heritage Foundation)

Advertisement

According to CNBC, Democrats are now exploring other options but that doesn't mean the proposal won't end up in future legislative negotiations over Build Back Better.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement