Watch Scott Jennings Annihilate a CNN Host's Silly Question About the Anti-ICE Terror...
After This Answer From a Mamdani Supporter, You Can See How He Became...
Watch a NYT Columnist Obliterate the Left's Main Obsession in Less Than Six...
After This Court Ruling on Joe Biden's Tapes, the Lib Media Should Brace...
AZ Dems Facing Total Disaster in This Must-Win House Race
Watch Don Lemon Immediately Undercut His Own Talking Point in the Same Sentence
There's Another Reason Why This Dem Rep Won't Seek Re-Election, but, of Course,...
Did James Talarico Really Make Fun of Childhood Dyslexia?
While He Mulls Arresting Netanyahu, Zohran Mamdani Hosts an Actual Terrorist at Gracie...
Nicaragua Proves You Can Vote Your Way Into Socialism, but You Can't Vote...
New UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham Is Already Making Environmentalists Mad
Struggling in the Polls, Abdul El-Sayed Is Now Pretending He Likes Jews and...
A New York School District Is Testing a Cost Saving Measure for the...
Who Are Our Domestic Enemies?
The World Is Collapsing—or Is It?
Tipsheet

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy

Dems Reportedly Give Up Dream of 'Insane' Tax on Ultra Wealthy
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Democrats appear to have thrown in the towel on their plan to tax unrealized capital gains.

The tax, which was blasted as total "insanity," was expected to hit earners with $1 billion in assets or $100 million in income for three consecutive years, The Wall Street Journal reported in October. 

Advertisement

At the time, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the plan “would help get at capital gains, which are an extraordinarily large part of the incomes of the wealthiest individuals, and right now escape taxation, until they’re realized, and often they’re unrealized in the death benefit from a so-called step up of basis.”

The Heritage Foundation said the proposal was likely "an unconstitutional wealth tax," which, if passed, could force Treasury "to spend trillions of dollars without an adequate source of funding."

Article I, Sections 8 and 9 of the Constitution deny Congress the power to levy a direct tax unless it’s “apportioned among the several states” in proportion to population. That means that the tax must be spread evenly among every person in every state.

In Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust (1895), the Supreme Court held that a tax is direct if it’s “upon property holders in respect of their estates, whether real or personal, or of the income yielded by such estates, and the payment of which cannot be avoided.”

More recently, in NFIB v. Sebelius (2012), the court reaffirmed that taxes on personal property are direct taxes.

A tax on unrealized capital gains would be a direct tax because it’s a tax on personal property paid by someone who cannot—quoting the Pollock decision—“shift the burden upon some one [sic] else.” As a direct tax, Democrats’ proposed tax must be spread equally among the populations of the states to pass constitutional muster, but it isn’t. (The Heritage Foundation)

Advertisement

According to CNBC, Democrats are now exploring other options but that doesn't mean the proposal won't end up in future legislative negotiations over Build Back Better.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos