CNN Host Dropped the Most Insane Line About the Charlie Kirk Assassination
MSNBC Reporter: No One on the Internet Is Cheering About Charlie Kirk's Assassination
CNN Reporter Just Ate It Over Her Initial Reporting About the Charlie Kirk...
Man in Federal Custody After Slamming Vehicle Into FBI Field Office Gate
Explosive Clash: Dearborn Mayor Attacks Resident Over Terrorist Street Naming
What This Reporter Said About Charlie Kirk's Killer's Romance With Trans Partner Will...
Graham Platner Fails to Tone Down the Rhetoric As He Calls for Dems...
Department of Justice Strips Child Rapist of U.S. Citizenship
Cartel Terror Meets U.S. Crackdown: $5 Million for El Ruso
Raffensperger Launches Bid for Georgia Governor
Trump Announces GOP to Host a Midterm Convention
Mike Pence Has a New Job
Newsom, Who Had Kirk As First Podcast Guest, Shares His Thoughts About TPUSA...
Remember the First Man They Arrested After Charlie Kirk Was Shot? New Details...
Trump Is Picking Great Nominees – Let’s Let Him Cook
Tipsheet
Premium

Timing of Edit to WHO Page on Vaccinating Children Raises Questions About Big Tech Influence

AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

For as many faults as the World Health Organization (WHO) has, it ought to be commended for taking a different approach to children amid the coronavirus pandemic than the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Particularly, it never advised children two and up to be masked as the CDC did. Given the "psychosocial and developmental milestones" in young children, the WHO recommended kids five and under don't wear them and those between 6-11 to only use them under certain conditions. 

Similarly, until very recently, the WHO also advised against vaccinating children "for the moment."

Behold, its very reasonable position: "There is not yet enough evidence on the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in children to make recommendations for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults."

Then something strange happened. Its tune changed a bit, which happened to coincide with Big Tech not liking this recommendation very much. 

Gone is the big headline that read, "Children should not be vaccinated for the moment." In its place is this: 

Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults, so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers.   

More evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19.

WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) has concluded that the Pfizer/BionTech vaccine is suitable for use by people aged 12 years and above. Children aged between 12 and 15 who are at high risk may be offered this vaccine alongside other priority groups for vaccination.

Vaccine trials for children are ongoing and WHO will update its recommendations when the evidence or epidemiological situation warrants a change in policy. (WHO)

The Science is just rapidly evolving, I'm sure. Meanwhile, the CDC is having its emergency meeting this week to discuss the COVID-19 vaccines in adolescents, particularly discussing reports of myocarditis after receiving the mRNA vaccines. 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos