Seditionist Blue Falcon Democrats Stunned to Be Held Accountable for Their Behavior
Sorry, Deep State, Leaking Classified Communiques Isn't Going to Work This Time
Five Things to Be Thankful for in 2025
Can the 'Lost Generation' Be Found?
Thanksgiving to God and America
What You Got—That's All You Got
Hineni: Thanksgiving’s Answer to Ayeka
President Washington’s Thanksgiving Proclamation Endures
Communism Never Works, Not Even With Pilgrims
Jeffrey Epstein: A Hero to Democrats
Trump Orders Re-Vetting of Afghani Immigrants After D.C. Shooting of Two National Guardsme...
Lowe’s Home Centers to Pay $12M Penalty for Lead Paint Violations in Home...
National Guard Shooter Identified As Afghani 29-Year-Old Rahmanullah Lakanwal
From Sacred Space to Political Target: How New York Is Flirting With the...
Michigan Pharmacist Sentenced to 46 Months for $4M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Chauvin’s Attorney Files Motion for New Trial

Court TV via AP, Pool

Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin’s defense attorney filed a motion on Tuesday for a new trial on several grounds, including that there were abuses of discretion preventing his client from receiving a fair trial.

Advertisement

Chauvin was found guilty last month of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in Floyd’s death. 

“The Court abused its discretion when it failed to sequester the jury for the duration of the trial, or in the least, admonish them to avoid all media, which resulted in jury exposure to prejudicial publicity regarding the trial during the proceedings, as well as jury intimidation and potential fear of retribution among jurors, which violated Mr. Chauvin’s constitutional rights to due process and to a fair trial,” according to the court filing. 

Additionally, attorney Eric Nelson said Chauvin’s constitutional rights were violated by not allowing the trial to take place outside of Hennepin County. He also pointed to jury misconduct and said the judge abused the discretion of the court.

Nelson also asked the judge for a hearing to impeach the verdict on the grounds that the jury committed misconduct, felt race-based pressure, felt intimidated or threatened, and/or failed to adhere to jury instructions, though the filing did not include details about that assertion. To impeach a verdict is to question its validity. (AP)

Advertisement

According to CBS Minnesota, a spokesman from Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison's office said in a statement on Tuesday that "the court has already rejected many of these arguments and the State will vigorously oppose them.”

The filing did not include recent reports that one of the jurors participated in a March on Washington, where Floyd's family spoke, to honor MLK Jr., and photos of him from that event show him wearing a shirt that read "Get Your Knee Off Our Necks" and a BLM hat. On a jury questionnaire he responded "no" to a question about when he or someone close to him "participated in protests about police use of fore or police brutality." The juror has defended his actions. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement