Here's What Trump Did After That Pharma Executive Collapsed in the Oval Office
Sydney Sweeney's Face When Asked About Her American Eagle Jeans Ad Is Priceless
A Century Later, Some Haven't Learned History's Lessons on Communism
Video From Condé Nast Shows It Is Like a Daycare Center for Journos...
Leaked Docs Show the DSA's Laundry List of Anti-Israel Demands for Mamdani's Administratio...
Defending Education Wins Free Speech Victory Over Ohio District's 'Anti-Harassment' Polici...
Maine Voters OK Red Flag Law Because Experts Blew It
It's Time to Stigmatize Some People Again
Don't Mamdani My Miami
100-Year-Old WWII Veteran Says the Sacrifices of His Generation Were Not Worth It
Tucker Carlson Praises Venezuelan Tyrant Nicolás Maduro As 'Socially Conservative'
Surrender, But Don't Give Yourself Away
Trump Orders DOJ To Investigate Foreign Meat-Packing Companies Over Price-Fixing
US Strikes Deal To Restore Funding To Cornell University
38 Charged Following Investigations by the Nashville Homeland Security Task Force
Tipsheet

US Reportedly Seeks Warrant for the Arrest of Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange

CNN reported Thursday evening that US authorities have prepared charges for the arrest of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, citing “officials familiar with the matter.”

Advertisement

The investigation of Assange dates back to 2010, but CNN says that prosecutors “now believe they have found a way to move forward,” despite First Amendment concerns.

During the Obama administration, the Justice Department “determined it would be difficult to bring charges against Assange because WikiLeaks wasn't alone in publishing documents stolen by Manning. Several newspapers, including The New York Times, did as well. The investigation continued, but any possible charges were put on hold,” CNN reports, citing US officials involved in the process then.

However, “The US view of WikiLeaks and Assange began to change after investigators found what they believe was proof that WikiLeaks played an active role in helping Edward Snowden, a former NSA analyst, disclose a massive cache of classified documents."

The Washington Post also reported Thursday that “Federal prosecutors are weighing whether to bring criminal charges against members of the WikiLeaks organization, taking a second look at a 2010 leak of diplomatic cables and military documents and investigating whether the group bears criminal responsibility for the more recent revelation of sensitive CIA cyber-tools.”

Advertisement

Barry J. Pollack, an attorney for Assange, told the Post that there was “no legitimate basis for the Department of Justice to treat WikiLeaks differently than it treats other journalists.”

“WikiLeaks is a publisher, and they are publishing truthful information that is in the public’s interest,” Pollack claimed. “Democracy thrives because there are independent journalists reporting on what it is that the government is doing.”

Pollack called the Obama administration “no shrinking violet when it came to pursuing reporters and journalists.” He said he hoped “this administration will be more respectful, not less respectful, of the First Amendment than the prior administration was.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement