Florida’s DCF Took Their Children—and the Supreme Court Just Turned Its Back on...
Trump Administration Just Made the Most Significant Drug Policy Change in Decades
Trump's Navy Just Sent a Brutal Message to Iran on the High Seas
Wisconsin's Lt. Governor Vows to Craft State Budgets in Secret If She Succeeds...
Audit Shows Seattle Followed the California Model of Dealing With Homelessness
Detroit Is So Far Gone, Officials Are Begging Criminals Not to Steal These
Not One Democrat Supports Michigan's House Judiciary Committee Efforts to Protect Kids Fro...
A Loophole in Pennsylvania Law Allowed a Registered Sex Offender to Become a...
That Thing That Never Happens Happened Again, and a Mexican National Faces Deportation...
What America Can Learn From Australia About Treating Veterans With MDMA
SPLC, Swalwell, and the War for America's Minds
Tennessee Town Benefits From Strong Gun Industry Protections in State
Chuck Schumer Gets Put in His Place After Claiming Nobody Respects ICE or...
President Trump's Trump Card: Kharg Island
The SPLC Owed Us an Apology -- A Federal Grand Jury Just Handed...
Tipsheet

US Reportedly Seeks Warrant for the Arrest of Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange

US Reportedly Seeks Warrant for the Arrest of Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange

CNN reported Thursday evening that US authorities have prepared charges for the arrest of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, citing “officials familiar with the matter.”

Advertisement

The investigation of Assange dates back to 2010, but CNN says that prosecutors “now believe they have found a way to move forward,” despite First Amendment concerns.

During the Obama administration, the Justice Department “determined it would be difficult to bring charges against Assange because WikiLeaks wasn't alone in publishing documents stolen by Manning. Several newspapers, including The New York Times, did as well. The investigation continued, but any possible charges were put on hold,” CNN reports, citing US officials involved in the process then.

However, “The US view of WikiLeaks and Assange began to change after investigators found what they believe was proof that WikiLeaks played an active role in helping Edward Snowden, a former NSA analyst, disclose a massive cache of classified documents."

The Washington Post also reported Thursday that “Federal prosecutors are weighing whether to bring criminal charges against members of the WikiLeaks organization, taking a second look at a 2010 leak of diplomatic cables and military documents and investigating whether the group bears criminal responsibility for the more recent revelation of sensitive CIA cyber-tools.”

Advertisement

Barry J. Pollack, an attorney for Assange, told the Post that there was “no legitimate basis for the Department of Justice to treat WikiLeaks differently than it treats other journalists.”

“WikiLeaks is a publisher, and they are publishing truthful information that is in the public’s interest,” Pollack claimed. “Democracy thrives because there are independent journalists reporting on what it is that the government is doing.”

Pollack called the Obama administration “no shrinking violet when it came to pursuing reporters and journalists.” He said he hoped “this administration will be more respectful, not less respectful, of the First Amendment than the prior administration was.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement