Clarence Thomas Blasts the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment Punt
Did You Catch Axios' Recent Headlines About the Boulder Terror Attack? Who's Running...
Greenpeace Just Humiliated Macron in the Most French Way Possible
Gavin Newsom Thought He Could Stop Trump's Tariffs – a Federal Judge Had...
Here's What You Should Know About Mohamad Soliman
Jewish Americans Can No Longer Afford to Be Unarmed
Sanctuary States, Sleeper Cells, and a Nation on the Brink
Supreme Court Takes Up Key Election Law Case
White House Shuts Down One of the 'Most Disgusting Lies' Being Spread About...
America, We Have a Serious Hamas Violence Problem. Not Over There. Here.
The Bad News for Democrats Isn't the Only Good News for Republicans With...
Kat Cammack Calls for Federal Funds to Be Withheld From Universities
Two People Rescued After Plane Crashes Off the Coast of Connecticut
Marco Rubio Has a Warning for 'All Terrorists'
This Transgender Athlete Shared This Flippant Response After Dominating a Women's Race
Tipsheet

Cotton Placed Holds on DOJ Nominees After Not Hearing Back on Department's 'Refusal' to Defend U.S. Marshalls

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) placed holds on all Department of Justice nominees Tuesday after it failed to respond to the lawmaker's letter concerning allegations that the Biden administration is not representing U.S. Marshalls sued over their actions in defending the Portland federal courthouse amid Black Lives Matter riots in 2020.

Advertisement

Eight nominees – four U.S. attorney nominations awaiting votes in the Senate, two U.S. attorneys awaiting votes in the Judiciary Committee and two U.S. Marshals awaiting votes in committee – are now held up by Cotton's recent move.

The GOP senator sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland on Monday asking that the DOJ confirm that it is representing the U.S. Marshals or funding their private counsel, or to "explain why on earth you're not."

"These courageous officers were attacked by left-wing street militants with weapons such as mortar fire, ball bearings, and blinding lasers," Cotton wrote in the letter. "A refusal to represent these Deputy Marshals would violate the Department’s long-standing practice — not to mention its moral duty — to defend law-enforcement officers when they’re sued for actions in the line of duty."

Cotton vowed to block the department's nominees if he did not receive a "satisfactory" response by 3 p.m. Tuesday, and now, the senator is moving forward with his threat to object to DOJ nominees.

The Arkansas lawmaker by himself cannot block a presidential nominee indefinitely but Senates rules do allow him to delay confirmation of nominees for days or weeks when they otherwise could have been confirmed by unanimous consent.

The DOJ said in a statement Monday to the New York Post that Cotton's letter is being reviewed and that the department is representing several federal employees facing lawsuits over the Portland riots.

Advertisement

"The department currently represents or has paid for representation of over 70 federal employees who have been sued in connection with the events in Portland," a DOJ spokesperson said. "Indeed, to date, the department has denied legal representation for only one federal employee in these cases."

But according to Fox News, at least three U.S. Marshals say that they had to seek private legal representation because the DOJ has not yet made a final decision on their cases.

And the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund told Fox News on Monday that one marshall it was representing had outright been denied a legal defense by the DOJ.

"After careful review and consideration of the information currently available, I have determined that representation would not be in the interest of the United States. Accordingly, the request for representation is denied," the DOJ wrote.

The Portland federal courthouse became the site of nightly clashes between rioters and law enforcement following the May 2020 death of George Floyd, leading a number of demonstrators to file lawsuits against U.S. Marshalls for alleged excessive use of force.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement