We're Back to This Silly Game Again: Someone Leaked Steve Witkoff's Communications With...
What the Hell Did These Reporters Just Say About the National Guard Shooting?
Mr. Governor, What You Just Said IS NOT Helpful Regarding Today's Shooting of...
What Happened to 'Silence Is Violence'?
America First at the National Parks: Foreign Tourists Face Increased New Fees Beginning...
Trump Orders Re-Vetting of Afghani Immigrants After D.C. Shooting of Two National Guardsme...
Lowe’s Home Centers to Pay $12M Penalty for Lead Paint Violations in Home...
National Guard Shooter Identified As Afghani 29-Year-Old Rahmanullah Lakanwal
From Sacred Space to Political Target: How New York Is Flirting With the...
Michigan Pharmacist Sentenced to 46 Months for $4M Medicare Fraud Scheme
21 Attorneys General Sue USDA After It Kicked Some Immigrants Off SNAP
National Guardsmen Ambushed in DC Were 'Targeted'
ICE Arrests Alleged Sex Offender Working at Michigan College
Bomb Squad to Ballot: Why Alexandra del Moral Mealer Deserves to Represent Texas's...
Two National Guardsmen Shot Near White House, Trump Weighs in on Truth Social
Tipsheet

Justice Breyer on Court Packing: Americans 'Will Lose Trust in the Court'

Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said Sunday that the proposal from several Democrats to pack the court could lead to the American people losing faith in the bench.

Advertisement

In an interview with Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday," Breyer warned that Democrats' efforts to expand the Supreme Court to allow President Joe Biden to appoint several justices could lead to the court losing public trust.

"Well, if one party could do it, I guess another party could do it," Breyer said. "On the surface, it seems to me, you start changing all these things around and people will lose trust in the court."

The Clinton appointee, however, is not opposed to all reform regarding the Supreme Court, telling Wallace that he is open to the idea of term limits for justices.

"I think you could do that. It should be a very long-term because you don't want the judge who's holding that term the start thinking about his next job," Breyer said. "But it would make life easier for me."

And while Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg had remained on the bench until their deaths, the 83-year-old Breyer said that he does not "intend to die on the court. I don't think I'll be there forever."

This comes amid calls from Democrats for Breyer to retire while Democrats still have control the White House and the Senate, allowing a liberal justice to take his place before the Republicans have the opportunity to flip the Senate in the 2022 midterm elections. 

Advertisement

Breyer said there are"many considerations" that go into his decision about the timing of his retirement.

"There are many factors, in fact, quite a few," he said. "And the role of the court and so forth is one of them. And the situation, the institutional considerations are some. And I believe, I can't say I take anything perfectly into account, but in my own mind, I think about those things."

"I didn't retire because I decided on balance I wouldn't retire," he continued.

Breyer went on to say that, despite the political lens that many people view the court and the selection of justices in the current day, he does not serve just one party, but rather, he serves all Americans.

"I'm there for everybody. I'm not just there for the Democrats. I'm not just there for the Republicans. And I'm not just there because the president was a Democrat who appointed me," he said. "It's a very great privilege to be in that job. And part of it is to remember that you're there for everyone. They won't like what you say half the time – or more. But you're still there for them."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos