Republicans Have an Ineptitude Problem
Ex-Biden Staffer Charged With Murder. Here's What Happened.
What Exactly Is the Purpose of NATO in the Year 2026?
Plainclothes Miracle
Jim Acosta Whines That Trump Is 'Winning' His War on the Press
America at 250: Rediscovering Exceptionalism in Rail and Space
The Sudden Political Star of Trump II: Marco Rubio
Barabbas or Bust
Prayer to Remove the Veil of Evil Darkness Over Iran
Good Friday, Resurrection Sunday and the Search for Peace in a Troubled World
Why the Bernie-AOC AI Strategy Is a Gift to Big Tech
Why Not Boots on the Ground in Iran
The Passion Is Not About Death — It’s About a Wedding
Todd Blanche: ActBlue Allegations a 'Priority' of New DOJ
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Moves to End Gun-Free Zones on U.S. Military...
Tipsheet

Justice Jackson Says the 'Most Horrible Thing I've Ever Heard' About the First Amendment

Justice Jackson Says the 'Most Horrible Thing I've Ever Heard' About the First Amendment
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Murthy v. Missouri. At the center of the case is the federal government's coercing of social media companies to take down stories and content bureaucrats deemed "misinformation" during the COVID-19 pandemic. This type of censorship was repeatedly touted by the Biden White House. 

Advertisement

During arguments, liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson came to the defense of the government and expressed concern the case would limit federal power. 

Jackson's claims about the First Amendment didn't sit well with constitutional scholars, including Republican Senator Eric Schmitt. Schmitt brought the case against the Biden administration when he served as Missouri's attorney general.

Advertisement

Related:

CENSORSHIP

The White House is refusing to comment on the case and whether officials are still in touch with social media companies about censoring information. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement