So, Nancy Mace's Gubernatorial Hopes Might've Been Nuked From Orbit...
Scott Pelley Thinks He Runs CBS News; MS NOW Delivers a Gross of...
To Democrats, Cosplaying the Oppression of Women Is 'Fun'
This Is How You Stop Mass Shootings at Churches
Javier Milei's Experiment in Pure Free Markets Just Proved the 'Experts' Wrong Again
Body Cam Footage Released in the Shocking Murder of Henry Nowak
Florida Scores Major Win to Keep New Electoral Map in Place
Talarico Campaign Refuses to Deny He Had Inappropriate Relationships With Other Staffers
Slain Student's Family Blasts Chicago's Sanctuary Policies After Killer Found With Weapon...
New York's Government Won't Hand Over Documents About the CDL Holder Who Killed...
Graham Platner Ducks Media Interviews After Explosive Sexting Scandal
Anti-Weaponization Fund Gets Scrapped, But That's Not Enough for Chuck Schumer
Federal Court Blocks Trump Administration Ban on Transgender Service Members
Goodbye Pride Month, Hello Nuclear Family Month
She's Back? Janet Mills Hints at Last-Ditch Shake Up in Maine Senate Race
Tipsheet

Judge Dismisses Another Charge Against Kyle Rittenhouse

Judge Dismisses Another Charge Against Kyle Rittenhouse
Mark Hertzberg/Pool Photo via AP

Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed the charge of possession of a dangerous weapon against 18-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse Monday as prosecutors and defense attorneys make their final arguments in his trial. 

Advertisement

"Count six is dismissed," Schroeder declared after asking questions about the barrel length and legality of the rifle. 

Count six was the "possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18." 

The Judge dropped the charge after interpreting Wisconsin law, which allows for a person under 18 to possess a rifle that does not have a short barrel. 

George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley explains:

The problem with the Wisconsin statute is not a problem of pluralization but definition. It is not clear that the statute actually bars possession by Rittenhouse. Indeed, it may come down to the length of Rittenhouse’s weapon and the prosecutors never bothered to measure it and place it into evidence.

In Wisconsin, minors cannot possess short-barreled rifles under Section 941.28. Putting aside the failure to put evidence into the record to claim such a short length, it does not appear to be the case here. Rittenhouse used a Smith & Wesson MP-15 with an advertised barrel length of 16 inches and the overall length is 36.9 inches. That is not a short barrel.

Advertisement

Closing arguments in the case are expected to finish Monday. The jury will then deliberate on the remaining five charges of first-degree reckless homicide (two counts), first-degree recklessly endangering safety (two counts) and attempted-first degree homicide. Early in the trial, a charge related to the violation of a government curfew was also thrown out. 

Throughout the trial, which you can find extensive coverage of here, defense attorneys for Rittenhouse have argued the teenager was acting in self-defense when he shot three men who violently attacked him. Two of them were killed, all three had criminal records. 

Rittenhouse, who was 17-years-old at the time of the incident last summer, testified in his own defense and argued the same. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement