Oh, That's Who Wrote the Hit Piece on Kash Patel in The Atlantic?
This Voter's Question to Pete Buttigieg at a Town Hall Event Was Just...
This Republican Just Introduced the 'Mamdani Act' – Here's What It Will Do
This Woman Brokered Arms Deals for Iran – Now She's Facing Decades in...
This Democrat Running for Congress in Wisconsin Is Hiding DC Insider Ties
Democrats Say No One Belongs in Jail for Smoking Weed, Forgetting Who They...
A California Man Is in Hot Water for Nationwide Scam Involving LEGO Sets
Brandon Johnson Plays the Race Card Over Restaurant Worker Wages
Elizabeth Warren Says the Dem With the Nazi Tattoo Is 'Her Kind of...
Israeli Officials Respond As Photo of IDF Soldier Destroying a Statue of Jesus...
Republicans Post Historic Fundraising Edge Over Democrats in Early 2026
'It’s Getting Dangerous': Nick Shirley Reveals Doxxing and Death Threats Over His Fraud...
President Trump Slams Obama’s Iran Deal As the 'One of the Worst Ever,'...
Companies Can Now Begin Applying for Tariff Refunds With Costs Expected to Exceed...
Ro Khanna Doubles Down When Asked If He Really Thinks Obama's Leadership on...
Tipsheet

Judge Dismisses Another Charge Against Kyle Rittenhouse

Judge Dismisses Another Charge Against Kyle Rittenhouse
Mark Hertzberg/Pool Photo via AP

Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed the charge of possession of a dangerous weapon against 18-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse Monday as prosecutors and defense attorneys make their final arguments in his trial. 

Advertisement

"Count six is dismissed," Schroeder declared after asking questions about the barrel length and legality of the rifle. 

Count six was the "possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18." 

The Judge dropped the charge after interpreting Wisconsin law, which allows for a person under 18 to possess a rifle that does not have a short barrel. 

George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley explains:

The problem with the Wisconsin statute is not a problem of pluralization but definition. It is not clear that the statute actually bars possession by Rittenhouse. Indeed, it may come down to the length of Rittenhouse’s weapon and the prosecutors never bothered to measure it and place it into evidence.

In Wisconsin, minors cannot possess short-barreled rifles under Section 941.28. Putting aside the failure to put evidence into the record to claim such a short length, it does not appear to be the case here. Rittenhouse used a Smith & Wesson MP-15 with an advertised barrel length of 16 inches and the overall length is 36.9 inches. That is not a short barrel.

Advertisement

Closing arguments in the case are expected to finish Monday. The jury will then deliberate on the remaining five charges of first-degree reckless homicide (two counts), first-degree recklessly endangering safety (two counts) and attempted-first degree homicide. Early in the trial, a charge related to the violation of a government curfew was also thrown out. 

Throughout the trial, which you can find extensive coverage of here, defense attorneys for Rittenhouse have argued the teenager was acting in self-defense when he shot three men who violently attacked him. Two of them were killed, all three had criminal records. 

Rittenhouse, who was 17-years-old at the time of the incident last summer, testified in his own defense and argued the same. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement