10 Hard Facts About Ukraine and NATO
We Have Some Details About the Epstein Document Dump That's Coming Tomorrow
The Liberal Meltdown Continues and Is Glorious (but Also Dangerous)
A Warning for President Trump
The Regulatory State Continues to Target Fantasy Sports
The Unmatched Bigotry of Joy Reid
The Top Task for Team Trump
Poor Europe: Denial, Decline, Demise
Trump Needs Congress to Deliver on Lower Pricesinl
Mine, Baby, Mine – Right Here in the USA!
President Trump Wants to Abolish the Department of Education. Sounds Outrageous to Some.
Prosecute Released Palestinians
The ICE-Man Cometh
Mexico’s Bid to Swipe Second Amendment Rights Explained
Moving Fast and Breaking Things Does Not Work in Washington
Tipsheet

Bombshell: Fauci Said Risk of Manipulating Bat Viruses Was Worth a Potential Pandemic

(Greg Nash/Pool via AP)

Things keep getting worse for NIH Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, who continues to say during testimony on Capitol Hill that he didn't fund Frankenstein gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

Advertisement

According to The Weekend Australian, Fauci wrote in 2012 that continuing dangerous gain-of-function research was worth the risk of a pandemic. 

In previously unreported remarks, Dr Fauci supported the contentious gain-of-­function experiments that some now fear might have led to an escape from a Wuhan laboratory causing the Covid-19 pandemic, calling them “important work”.

An investigation by The Weekend Australian has also confirmed Dr Fauci, the director of the Nat­ional Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, did not alert senior White House officials before lifting the ban on gain-of-function research in 2017.

Writing in the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012, Dr Fauci acknowledged the controversial scientific research could spark a pandemic.

“In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” he wrote. “Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?

“Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.

Advertisement

After telling Republican Senator Rand Paul two weeks ago that he "never" approved grant funding through the NIH for gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Fauci changed his tune this week and said he simply told Chinese Communist Party controlled scientists not to conduct the research. 

From Fauci's exchange with Republican Senator John Kennedy: 

Kennedy: “Here’s where I’m getting at: You gave them money, and you said, ‘Don’t do gain-of-function research.’”

Fauci: “Correct.”

Kennedy: “And they said, ‘We won’t.’”

Fauci: “Correct.”

Kennedy: “And you have no way of knowing whether they did or not, except you trust them. Is that right?”

Fauci: “Well, we generally always trust the grantee to do what they say, and you look at the results—”

Kennedy: “Have you ever had a grantee lie to you?”

Fauci: “I cannot guarantee that a grantee has not lied to us because you never know.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement