Florida Wants the Feds to Crack Down on Blue State CDL Handouts
'It Will Stun You': Miller Warns D.C. Crime Manipulation Is Worse Than Previously...
Trump Signs Additional Orders to Restore Law and Order
This Is Why Trump Is Sending the Feds to Chicago
When You Recognize It, You'll See How Gavin Newsom Obliterated His Own Attacks...
Did You See How DNC Chairman Ken Martin Kicked Off Their Summer Meeting?
It's Starting to Feel Like the Golden Age
Bill Maher Nails Why Trump Connects With Voters...and Dems Won't Like It
On Home Buying, Maybe We're All Asking for Too Much
How 'Ghost Gun' Rules Are Running Slap Into Reality
Trump Just Took Another Step to Make D.C. Safer
There's Been a Major Update Regarding Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Trump Wants Grassley to Tell Dems These Three Words Over 'Blue Slip' Tradition
A Disturbing Number of People Have Signed Petition Supporting Illegal Trucker Accused of...
Are Democrats Really Sure They Want to Escalate the Redistricting Wars?
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear a Landmark Second Amendment Case

AP Photo/Seth Perlman, File

After a decade long hiatus, the Supreme Court has finally agreed to hear a landmark Second Amendment case. 

Advertisement

Cam Edwards over at Bearing Arms has more:

For over a month now, the Court had been considering whether or not to accept a challenge to New York’s concealed carry licensing laws, but in the meantime SCOTUS has turned away several other cases dealing with the right to keep and bear arms. Many gun owners had been growing increasingly frustrated with what they see as the Court’s reluctance to address the issue, even with what’s supposed to be a solid majority in favor of protecting the right to both keep and bear arms.

That frustration has likely turned to elation for many of those gun owners, with the Court accepting the case today and determining that it will decide the question of “whether the State’s denial of petitioners’ applications for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment.”

That question is worded slightly different than the one posed by the plaintiffs, which asked the Court to decide “whether the Second Amendment allows the government to prohibit ordinary law-abiding citizens from carrying handguns outside the home for self-defense,” but the core question still remains: are the rights of average, everyday citizens violated by the state’s discretionary “may issue” laws that don’t recognize self-defense as a valid reason to carry.

Advertisement

Last year more than 8 million Americans became new gun owners, citing self defense as the main reason they decided to purchase their first firearm.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement