What This New York Times Columnist Said About Nick Fuentes Will Infuriate You
This Is What John Fetterman Had to Say When Asked Whether He Would...
This Is What a Federal Judge Said About the Sandwich Throwing Case
Following Mass Stabbing on U.K. Train, Defense Secretary Floats Idea of TSA-Style Station...
Did VA Democrat AG Candidate Jay Jones Just Try to Kick a Dog?
Comedian Wanda Sykes: DEI for Thee, Not for Me
Woman Banned From California Gold's Gym After Confronting Man in Her Locker Room
A UK Judge Just Acquitted Climate Activists Who Vandalized Stonehenge
From Bathrooms to Train Platforms, Britain Is No Safe Place for Women
Zohran Mamdani Blames President Trump for Bomb Threats Against New Jersey Polling Places
Germany's Deindustrialization Is a Cautionary Tale Against 'Green' Climate Policies
Wisconsin's Voter Rolls Are a Mess
SAF Files Lawsuit Challenging New Jersey Over Illegal Gun Confiscation
Canada's Warning to America: Property Rights Are on the Chopping Block
Tanzanian Agricultural Student Joshua Mollel’s Body Still Held Hostage by Hamas in Gaza
Tipsheet

Tom Cotton Challenges Iran's Foreign Minister to a Debate on The Constitution Via Twitter

Nearly two months after firing off a letter to the Islamic Republic of Iran warning any nuclear deal that isn't approved by Congress will be temporary, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton is going after Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif directly via Twitter.

Advertisement

Cotton's full response

“President Obama promised sanctions would only be lifted when Iran’s compliance with restrictions on their nuclear program were verified. But earlier today, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif once again contradicted the President’s interpretation saying:

If we have an agreement on the 30th of June, within a few days after that, there will be a resolution before the UN Security Council under Article 41 of Chapter 7 which will be mandatory for all member states whether Senator Cotton likes it or not.

“Sanctions relief isn’t about what I like, but what will keep America safe from a nuclear-armed Iran. But I suspect Foreign Minister Zarif is saying what President Obama will not because the President knows such terms would be unacceptable to both Congress and the American people. The repeated provocative statements made by members of the Iranian leadership demonstrate why Iran cannot be trusted and why the President’s decision to pursue this deal and grant dangerous concessions to Iran was ill-advised from the beginning. These aren’t rhetorical tricks aimed at appealing to hard-liners in Iran; after all, Mr. Zarif was speaking in English in New York. Rather, they foreshadow the dangerous posture Iran will take and has taken repeatedly—including as recently as yesterday with the interception of a U.S.-affiliated cargo ship—if this deal moves forward.

“More, they reaffirm the need for Congress to approve any final deal and to conduct oversight over the Obama Administration’s actions. As we consider the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, I urge my colleagues to ensure we pass legislation strong enough to stop a bad deal in its tracks and protect the American people from a nuclear Iran.”
Advertisement

I'll leave you with this:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement