Did Bill Maher Really Just Say That About Q'Anon?
Report Exposes This Democrat's Ties to Terrorism
Midterm Palpitations
More Emotional Fervor Over the Washington Post Layoffs, As the Paper Proves Why...
Dear WaPo Journalists: How'd That Kamala Endorsement Boycott Work Out for You?
A Pro-Gun Bill Out of Illinois? Yeah, but Don't Get Your Hopes Up
Tucker Carlson Implies Muslims and Christians Get Along, It’s the Jews Who Oppress...
Harry Enten: 'Donald Trump, MAGA, JD Vance, They Ain't Going Nowhere'
White House Launches Trump RX To Slash Prescription Drug Cost
Jamaican Man Allegedly Stole 33,000 Pounds of Frozen Snow Crab, $400,000 of Designer...
The Washington Post’s Meltdown Is What Entitlement Looks Like
Florida Biofuel Company Owner Pleads Guilty in $7 Million EPA Biodiesel Scheme
Antifa Member Arrested After Urging Others To 'Hunt' ICE Agents
Authorities Arrest Maryland Man Accused of Stalking and Trying To Kill OMB Director...
Ex-Director of NY Legal Aid Group Blew Its Money on Bali Trip, Louis...
Tipsheet

Ginsburg: Fellow Justices Don’t Understand Hobby Lobby Case Since They’re Male, or Something

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined Katie Couric yesterday to discuss everything from her retirement plans (or lack thereof) to her fashionable collar collection. While addressing the controversial Hobby Lobby v. Burwell case, Ginsburg made an eyebrow-raising comment about five of her fellow justices.

Advertisement

In the highly anticipated decision, the high court ruled that closely held for-profit corporations would not be forced to provide contraceptive coverage that conflicts with their religious beliefs. Although Hobby Lobby was willing to provide 16 of the 20 birth control methods required under the mandate, those who spoke out against the business asserted that Hobby Lobby’s faith was infringing on their employees.

Couric asked, “All three women justices were in the minority in the Hobby Lobby decision. Do you believe that the five male justices truly understood the ramifications of their decision?”

“I would have to say no,” Ginsburg replied. “But justices continue to think and can change. So I am ever hopeful that if the court has a blind spot today, its eyes will be opened tomorrow.”

Couric pressed, “But you do, in fact, feel these five justices had a bit of a blind spot?” to which Ginsburg responded, “In Hobby Lobby, yes.”

Granted, Katie Couric asked a leading question but Justice Ginsburg’s response still stands. The five justices in the majority happened to be male while three of the four dissenters were female. Could this not possibly be because those who ruled in favor were appointed by Republican presidents and tend to vote more conservatively? Likewise, the remaining four were appointed by Democrat presidents and tend to vote more liberally.

Advertisement

Does Justice Ginsburg truly believe that it's impossible for male judges to see past their “blind spot” of being male in order to understand a case and uphold the Constitution? Imagine the national outrage that would occur if a male justice assumed the same of his female counterpart.

Parting thought: The legal team for Hobby Lobby was entirely comprised of women. Chew on that.

Watch the interview here:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement