So, That New VA Congressional Map That Dems Want Could Get Tossed
This Bill Would Create 'Homelessness Courts' and Ban Camping on Public Property
Trump Just Went Scorched Earth on Supreme Court Over Recent Rulings
Ilhan Omar Was Asked About Her Financial Scandal. She Didn't Handle It Well.
Democrats and the Media Go to Bat for the Southern Poverty Law Center
Suspect Who Killed DHS Employee in Georgia Crime Spree Found Dead in His...
Turns Out There Are Some Books the Left Is Okay With Banning
WI Gubernatorial Candidate Francesca Hong Is Happy to Receive the Endorsement of This...
The FBI Is Hunting for Two Men Who Stole $1.8 Million From Philadelphia...
Tom Steyer Just Secured the Most Hypocritical Endorsement of the California Governor's Rac...
Fire Senator Chris Murphy!
Gun Control Calls Follow Shreveport Shooting, but There's An Issue
Iran State Media and Officials Are Reportedly Ready for the War to Resume
Victor Davis Hanson Says Iran Is Running Out of Time
Here's What Iran Is Up to After President Trump Extended the Ceasefire
Tipsheet

Ginsburg: Fellow Justices Don’t Understand Hobby Lobby Case Since They’re Male, or Something

Ginsburg: Fellow Justices Don’t Understand Hobby Lobby Case Since They’re Male, or Something

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined Katie Couric yesterday to discuss everything from her retirement plans (or lack thereof) to her fashionable collar collection. While addressing the controversial Hobby Lobby v. Burwell case, Ginsburg made an eyebrow-raising comment about five of her fellow justices.

Advertisement

In the highly anticipated decision, the high court ruled that closely held for-profit corporations would not be forced to provide contraceptive coverage that conflicts with their religious beliefs. Although Hobby Lobby was willing to provide 16 of the 20 birth control methods required under the mandate, those who spoke out against the business asserted that Hobby Lobby’s faith was infringing on their employees.

Couric asked, “All three women justices were in the minority in the Hobby Lobby decision. Do you believe that the five male justices truly understood the ramifications of their decision?”

“I would have to say no,” Ginsburg replied. “But justices continue to think and can change. So I am ever hopeful that if the court has a blind spot today, its eyes will be opened tomorrow.”

Couric pressed, “But you do, in fact, feel these five justices had a bit of a blind spot?” to which Ginsburg responded, “In Hobby Lobby, yes.”

Granted, Katie Couric asked a leading question but Justice Ginsburg’s response still stands. The five justices in the majority happened to be male while three of the four dissenters were female. Could this not possibly be because those who ruled in favor were appointed by Republican presidents and tend to vote more conservatively? Likewise, the remaining four were appointed by Democrat presidents and tend to vote more liberally.

Advertisement

Does Justice Ginsburg truly believe that it's impossible for male judges to see past their “blind spot” of being male in order to understand a case and uphold the Constitution? Imagine the national outrage that would occur if a male justice assumed the same of his female counterpart.

Parting thought: The legal team for Hobby Lobby was entirely comprised of women. Chew on that.

Watch the interview here:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement