Our Virile Veep Shames the Impotent Libs
Minneapolis Police Chief Said the Quiet Part Out Loud Regarding the Recent Border...
Here's the Tweet That Every Republican Should Memorize Regarding the Border Patrol Shootin...
The Reactions to the Border Patrol Shooting in Minneapolis Have Been Messy...and It's...
James O'Keefe's Trip to Minneapolis Was Insane. Here's What Caught His Attention.
Play Stupid Games, Win Stupid Prizes
President Trump Announces Tom Homan Is Heading to Minneapolis to Manage ICE Operations
Dana Bash Tries to Corner Border Patrol Chief on Minneapolis Shooting. It Doesn’t...
Slate Writer Just Penned the Nastiest Attack on Usha Vance
Border Patrol Head Greg Bovino Tells the Press Just How Many Illegals He...
They're At it Again, Tim Walz Ramps Up Anti-ICE Rhetoric, Compares ICE to...
Not All Pirates Are Somali
Why Are There Black Marxist Leftists?
So That's What Tim Walz Is Doing With the National Guard
Time for Iran’s Nuremberg Trial
Tipsheet

Ginsburg: Fellow Justices Don’t Understand Hobby Lobby Case Since They’re Male, or Something

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined Katie Couric yesterday to discuss everything from her retirement plans (or lack thereof) to her fashionable collar collection. While addressing the controversial Hobby Lobby v. Burwell case, Ginsburg made an eyebrow-raising comment about five of her fellow justices.

Advertisement

In the highly anticipated decision, the high court ruled that closely held for-profit corporations would not be forced to provide contraceptive coverage that conflicts with their religious beliefs. Although Hobby Lobby was willing to provide 16 of the 20 birth control methods required under the mandate, those who spoke out against the business asserted that Hobby Lobby’s faith was infringing on their employees.

Couric asked, “All three women justices were in the minority in the Hobby Lobby decision. Do you believe that the five male justices truly understood the ramifications of their decision?”

“I would have to say no,” Ginsburg replied. “But justices continue to think and can change. So I am ever hopeful that if the court has a blind spot today, its eyes will be opened tomorrow.”

Couric pressed, “But you do, in fact, feel these five justices had a bit of a blind spot?” to which Ginsburg responded, “In Hobby Lobby, yes.”

Granted, Katie Couric asked a leading question but Justice Ginsburg’s response still stands. The five justices in the majority happened to be male while three of the four dissenters were female. Could this not possibly be because those who ruled in favor were appointed by Republican presidents and tend to vote more conservatively? Likewise, the remaining four were appointed by Democrat presidents and tend to vote more liberally.

Advertisement

Does Justice Ginsburg truly believe that it's impossible for male judges to see past their “blind spot” of being male in order to understand a case and uphold the Constitution? Imagine the national outrage that would occur if a male justice assumed the same of his female counterpart.

Parting thought: The legal team for Hobby Lobby was entirely comprised of women. Chew on that.

Watch the interview here:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement