Trump Sets the Records Strait on Iranian Tolls in Hormuz
Trump Congratulates Mamdani on Socialist Primary Wins, Then Gives Him a Reminder
Take a Guess Why Democrats Oppose Transparency in Children's Programming
Daraliza Avila Chevalier's Work With CUAD Could Be Grounds Not to Seat Her...
The Democratic Party Now Belongs to Socialists
Scott Jennings Sends a Warning After Socialist Victories in NY Primaries
Did You Hear New York Socialists' Creepy Chant Following Tuesday's Primary?
Trump Orders DOJ Probe Into Oil Companies Over Gas Prices That Still Aren’t...
Gavin Newsom Bragged About California's Job Growth. There's Just One Problem.
Speaker Mike Johnson Sounds the Alarm As Socialists Gain Ground in the Democratic...
President Trump Torches Republican 'Losers' After Senate Advances War Powers Resolution
Marco Rubio Landed in the Middle East Yesterday. Here's What He Had to...
America 250 Begins Tonight As Trump Takes the Stage on the National Mall
Another Day, Another Biden Appointed Judge Issuing an Insane Immigration Ruling
Trump Makes Major Move to Push for SAVE America Act
Tipsheet

Ginsburg: Fellow Justices Don’t Understand Hobby Lobby Case Since They’re Male, or Something

Ginsburg: Fellow Justices Don’t Understand Hobby Lobby Case Since They’re Male, or Something

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined Katie Couric yesterday to discuss everything from her retirement plans (or lack thereof) to her fashionable collar collection. While addressing the controversial Hobby Lobby v. Burwell case, Ginsburg made an eyebrow-raising comment about five of her fellow justices.

Advertisement

In the highly anticipated decision, the high court ruled that closely held for-profit corporations would not be forced to provide contraceptive coverage that conflicts with their religious beliefs. Although Hobby Lobby was willing to provide 16 of the 20 birth control methods required under the mandate, those who spoke out against the business asserted that Hobby Lobby’s faith was infringing on their employees.

Couric asked, “All three women justices were in the minority in the Hobby Lobby decision. Do you believe that the five male justices truly understood the ramifications of their decision?”

“I would have to say no,” Ginsburg replied. “But justices continue to think and can change. So I am ever hopeful that if the court has a blind spot today, its eyes will be opened tomorrow.”

Couric pressed, “But you do, in fact, feel these five justices had a bit of a blind spot?” to which Ginsburg responded, “In Hobby Lobby, yes.”

Granted, Katie Couric asked a leading question but Justice Ginsburg’s response still stands. The five justices in the majority happened to be male while three of the four dissenters were female. Could this not possibly be because those who ruled in favor were appointed by Republican presidents and tend to vote more conservatively? Likewise, the remaining four were appointed by Democrat presidents and tend to vote more liberally.

Advertisement

Does Justice Ginsburg truly believe that it's impossible for male judges to see past their “blind spot” of being male in order to understand a case and uphold the Constitution? Imagine the national outrage that would occur if a male justice assumed the same of his female counterpart.

Parting thought: The legal team for Hobby Lobby was entirely comprised of women. Chew on that.

Watch the interview here:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos