READ IT: U.S. and China Issue a Joint Statement on New Trade Negotiations
Latest Hit Piece on Pete Hegseth Is Pure Desperation, But Also Not a...
Is This Why the Libs Weren't Paying Attention to the US-China Trade News...
Where's Hunter? There's a Funny Rumor Circulating About the French President
Here's What the Pope's Brother Said About Nancy Pelosi. Holy Cow.
Libs Thought Trump Imploded With This Line in 2024. It Ended Up Helping...
Democrats Are In Panic Mode
Trump’s Trade Shockwave: Why Didn’t Anyone Do This Sooner?
Jasmine Crockett Just Revealed Democrats' 'White Boy' Plans for the Next Election
Yes, Republicans Should Absolutely Raise Taxes On The Rich
Bessent Reveals What the Chinese Delegation Told Him About Why They Ignored the...
The Pope and Politics: Vance Shares His Thoughts on the New Holy Father
Days After Firing Librarian of Congress, the White House Shows Top US Copyright...
US, China Agree to Drastically Lower Tariffs for 90-Day Period
Trump Can do the Impossible: Simultaneously Strengthen America’s Financials and Its Nation...
Tipsheet

Kyle Rittenhouse Provides Update on Which Big Tech Company He Is Suing

Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News via AP

Kyle Rittenhouse provided an update to his ongoing plans to sue the entities who defamed him as a racist mass shooter when he actually defended himself during the 2020 BLM riots in Kensoha, Wisconsin.

Advertisement

Rittenhouse and attorney Todd McMurtry told Fox News host Tucker Carlson they are looking at Facebook in particular because of how Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg described Rittenhouse's act of self-defense.

"We're going to make the media pay for what they did to me. They made it hard for me to live a normal life. I cannot go out in public. I can't go to the store. It’s hard for me to go anywhere without security. Doing basic things like taking my dog to the dog park is difficult. They made it really difficult to be normal. They affected future job opportunities to me," Rittenhouse explained.

"The first one I am taking looking at is Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg announced in a videotape that what Kyle was involved in was a mass murder and that is clearly defamatory as well. That is not protected by Section 230, the Communications Decency Act. In my opinion, Section 230 allows you to take down violent things or things that people don’t want to hear by telling the truth about Kyle, is not something that Section 230 enabled Facebook to take down. So that’s an example of what we plan to do with tech and also plan to do in the defamation arena," McMurtry said.

Advertisement

McMurtry pointed out that while news outlets can report on alleged crimes perpetrated by individuals, "but calling somebody a murderer in certain circumstances can be actionable. Other things that media personalities and people on social media said were clearly defamatory."

"I think that we have some strong grounds to proceed. We're...starting to look at those and evaluate them and look at opportunities to hold the media and tech accountable as Kyle promised," McMurtry added.

Rittenhouse said there have been a few instances of being harassed in public because of being defamed but his security team has been able to handle those situations.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement