Trump's Phone Got Seized by Special Counsel in Arctic Frost Spy Probe
Smoking Gun? We Have Damning New Emails That Might Sink James Comey
Here's What Exit Polls are Saying About New Jersey Governor's Race
They Are Coming for Your Pets
This Democrat Candidate Made Threats Against a GOP Senator – Now She's Mad...
The Democrats’ Disgusting New Narrative
If You're Traveling Next Week, You Might Want to Pay Attention to Secretary...
Woke and Broke: Antifa-Friendly Portland Bookstore Lays Off More Employees
Call to Rebuild Democratic Support in Rural America Ignores Party's Recent History
IDs for Thee, but Not for Me
Bill Gates Gets Mugged by Reality
Ben Shapiro Draws a Moral Line for Conservatism, Following Tucker Carlson's Nick Fuentes...
Texas Governor Threatens 100% Tariff for NY Residents Moving to Texas
Karoline Leavitt Responds to Mamdani After He Blames Trump for Election Day Bomb...
Articles of Impeachment Filed Against US District Judge Over Operation Arctic Frost
Tipsheet

Kyle Rittenhouse Provides Update on Which Big Tech Company He Is Suing

Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News via AP

Kyle Rittenhouse provided an update to his ongoing plans to sue the entities who defamed him as a racist mass shooter when he actually defended himself during the 2020 BLM riots in Kensoha, Wisconsin.

Advertisement

Rittenhouse and attorney Todd McMurtry told Fox News host Tucker Carlson they are looking at Facebook in particular because of how Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg described Rittenhouse's act of self-defense.

"We're going to make the media pay for what they did to me. They made it hard for me to live a normal life. I cannot go out in public. I can't go to the store. It’s hard for me to go anywhere without security. Doing basic things like taking my dog to the dog park is difficult. They made it really difficult to be normal. They affected future job opportunities to me," Rittenhouse explained.

"The first one I am taking looking at is Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg announced in a videotape that what Kyle was involved in was a mass murder and that is clearly defamatory as well. That is not protected by Section 230, the Communications Decency Act. In my opinion, Section 230 allows you to take down violent things or things that people don’t want to hear by telling the truth about Kyle, is not something that Section 230 enabled Facebook to take down. So that’s an example of what we plan to do with tech and also plan to do in the defamation arena," McMurtry said.

Advertisement

McMurtry pointed out that while news outlets can report on alleged crimes perpetrated by individuals, "but calling somebody a murderer in certain circumstances can be actionable. Other things that media personalities and people on social media said were clearly defamatory."

"I think that we have some strong grounds to proceed. We're...starting to look at those and evaluate them and look at opportunities to hold the media and tech accountable as Kyle promised," McMurtry added.

Rittenhouse said there have been a few instances of being harassed in public because of being defamed but his security team has been able to handle those situations.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement