Did You See This Clip of Obama's CIA Director Talking About Iran?
Outgoing Border Patrol Chief Shares One of His Biggest Regrets Before Retirement
Israel Moves to Ban Zohran Mamdani's Wife - This Is Why
These Arab Nations Have Told Iran's Diplomats to Go Pound Sand
How These City Employees Turned Taxpayer Cash Into Instagram Profits
Here's Who Will Be Joining MI Democrat Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed at a...
Katie Pavlich Grills Democrat Over Sanctuary Policies After Chicago Murder
Trump Needs a Short War
Ohio Bill Putting Teeth in Law Barring Local Gun Control Advances
Joe Kent vs. Mark Levin: A Heated Exchange Over Israel, Iran, and Charlie...
The Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Urges Trump to Continue Operation Epic Fury
Fetterman Drops the Hammer on Democrats' Tone Deaf Response to Sheridan Gorman's Murder
Democrat Wisconsin House Candidate Campaigns With Architect of Sanctuary City Policies
Republican Senate Candidate John Sununu Could Win in New Hampshire According to a...
Sen. Ted Cruz Just Got Confirmation That the Democrat-Run FBI Was Spying on...
Tipsheet

NPR Gets Dragged for Phony Fact Check on Hawley's Statements on SCOTUS Nominee

NPR Gets Dragged for Phony Fact Check on Hawley's Statements on SCOTUS Nominee
Al Drago/Pool via AP

NPR got pushback from Twitter users after it reported Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) "continued his misleading assertion" Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson had been lenient on child porn offenders when he questioned her during her confirmation hearing on Tuesday.

Advertisement

Hawley noted during his line of questioning that Jackson not only gave lighter sentences to child porn offenders than what federal guidelines recommended but he also pointed out she gave lesser sentences than what prosecutors were asking for and what she said in relation to the cases:

Advertisement

"You said that this defendant, through whom you only sentenced to three months in prison...'Your collection at the time you that were caught was not actually as large as it seems'...You also told the defendant, 'This seems to be a case where you were fascinated by sexual images involving essentially what were your peers.'"

"Judge, he was 18. These kids are 8. I don't see in what sense they're peers," he added.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement