Former Capitol Police Officer Michael Fanone Was Out of Control During Jack Smith's...
Darrell Issa's Questions for Jack Smith Did Not Sit Well With Dems
Jim Jordan Gets Jack Smith to Admit How Far He Was Willing to...
Is Political Murder Becoming ‘Acceptable’? These Numbers Say 'Yes.'
Governors Newsom and Walz Lurch Toward Infanticide
Bari Weiss Is Still Scorched After Running Disputed 60 Minutes Segment, and Another...
Passengers Applaud After Woman Kicked Off Miami Flight Following Bizarre Political Rant
Nick Shirley Gave Opening Remarks at the House Judiciary Committee Hearing on Fraud....
Javier Milei Declares the United States a 'Beacon of Liberty' at the World...
The First Son, Credited With Saving the Life of a 'Very Close' Female...
DHS Slams Democrat Story Which Claims ICE Used 5-Year-Old As Bait
Florida Nursing Assistant Convicted in $11.4 Million Medicare Brace Fraud Scheme
U.S. House Approves $10B for ICE Funding, Avoids Shutdown
Jury Convicts California Couple Charged with $100 Million Fraud
Two Men Sentenced in Nearly $2M COVID-19 Relief Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

NPR Gets Dragged for Phony Fact Check on Hawley's Statements on SCOTUS Nominee

Al Drago/Pool via AP

NPR got pushback from Twitter users after it reported Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) "continued his misleading assertion" Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson had been lenient on child porn offenders when he questioned her during her confirmation hearing on Tuesday.

Advertisement

Hawley noted during his line of questioning that Jackson not only gave lighter sentences to child porn offenders than what federal guidelines recommended but he also pointed out she gave lesser sentences than what prosecutors were asking for and what she said in relation to the cases:

Advertisement

"You said that this defendant, through whom you only sentenced to three months in prison...'Your collection at the time you that were caught was not actually as large as it seems'...You also told the defendant, 'This seems to be a case where you were fascinated by sexual images involving essentially what were your peers.'"

"Judge, he was 18. These kids are 8. I don't see in what sense they're peers," he added.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos