We Won't Get Caught: The Latest Russian Collusion Doc Involving Adam Schiff Is...
DC AG Looking for a Fight Over Trump's DC Takeover. He Should Focus...
We Can Thank This Local Outlet for Nuking the Dem Talking Points on...
Baseball Cards Are the New Casinos
Now is the time to strengthen Social Security
Churchill and Reagan Saw Mamdani Coming a Mile Away
If You Want to Defeat Them, Think Like Them
Breathing Easier: EPA's Bold Move to Axe the 'Endangerment Finding'
Fleeing Texas Lawmakers May Put Protections for Women, Young Girls at Risk
Will Barack Walk or Do the Time?
CNN 'Fact-Checks' Trump Live, Claims D.C. Crime Isn’t a Problem
Democrat Socialist Mayoral Candidate Pledges to Shield Illegal Aliens from 'Hostile Federa...
Democrats Rage Against Trump’s DC Crime Crackdown, Claim He Is 'Racially Profiling' Black...
Comer Applauds Trump for Cracking Down on D.C. Crime: 'A Promise Kept'
Cuomo Targets 'Millionaire Socialists' With ‘Zohran’s Law’ to Block Rich From Rent-Stabili...
Tipsheet

Kyle Rittenhouse's Defense Team Once Again Asks for a Mistrial But with a Twist

Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News via AP

KENOSHA, Wisc. — Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team once again asked Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder on Wednesday to declare a mistrial but without prejudice, meaning prosecutors could retry Rittenhouse if Schroeder grants the request. The previous time the defense asked for a mistrial, it was with prejudice.

Advertisement

The issue stems from what the defense team says the prosecution withheld video evidence from them and were given only given one version of drone footage the prosecution says proves Rittenhouse provoked Joseph Rosenbaum into chasing him.

"We had the video, not the clarity, not the quality, I think that's been conceded. We have done this case in a little bit different manner...We didn't have the quality of evidence that the state had until the case had been closed," said Corey Chirafisi.

Chirafisi said they consulted with Rittenhouse and they want the mistrial without prejudice, "based upon the fact that if we're really trying to get the heart of it, we've watched the video, I can tell you what we think but it doesn't matter what we think because we don't get to present that to the jury anymore."

"We have to ask for this and I'm asking for it. We understand that it's going to be without prejudice...We understand [the state] will do it again. But I think we will all have the same information, the same quality of videos, and I think that is required in a case like this where he's looking at a life sentence, potentially without parole if he's convicted," Chirafisi added.

Advertisement

Schroeder said he will not rule on the motion for a mistrial yet because the jury is still debating and asking about the video in question, but "it will still have to be addressed because the jury saw it here in the courtroom."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement