Oh, That's Who Wrote the Hit Piece on Kash Patel in The Atlantic?
This Voter's Question to Pete Buttigieg at a Town Hall Event Was Just...
This Republican Just Introduced the 'Mamdani Act' – Here's What It Will Do
This Woman Brokered Arms Deals for Iran – Now She's Facing Decades in...
This Democrat Running for Congress in Wisconsin Is Hiding DC Insider Ties
Democrats Say No One Belongs in Jail for Smoking Weed, Forgetting Who They...
A California Man Is in Hot Water for Nationwide Scam Involving LEGO Sets
Brandon Johnson Plays the Race Card Over Restaurant Worker Wages
Israeli Officials Respond As Photo of IDF Soldier Destroying a Statue of Jesus...
Republicans Post Historic Fundraising Edge Over Democrats in Early 2026
'It’s Getting Dangerous': Nick Shirley Reveals Doxxing and Death Threats Over His Fraud...
President Trump Slams Obama’s Iran Deal As the 'One of the Worst Ever,'...
Companies Can Now Begin Applying for Tariff Refunds With Costs Expected to Exceed...
Ro Khanna Doubles Down When Asked If He Really Thinks Obama's Leadership on...
Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer Resigns From Cabinet Post
Tipsheet

Kyle Rittenhouse's Defense Team Once Again Asks for a Mistrial But with a Twist

Kyle Rittenhouse's Defense Team Once Again Asks for a Mistrial But with a Twist
Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News via AP

KENOSHA, Wisc. — Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team once again asked Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder on Wednesday to declare a mistrial but without prejudice, meaning prosecutors could retry Rittenhouse if Schroeder grants the request. The previous time the defense asked for a mistrial, it was with prejudice.

Advertisement

The issue stems from what the defense team says the prosecution withheld video evidence from them and were given only given one version of drone footage the prosecution says proves Rittenhouse provoked Joseph Rosenbaum into chasing him.

"We had the video, not the clarity, not the quality, I think that's been conceded. We have done this case in a little bit different manner...We didn't have the quality of evidence that the state had until the case had been closed," said Corey Chirafisi.

Chirafisi said they consulted with Rittenhouse and they want the mistrial without prejudice, "based upon the fact that if we're really trying to get the heart of it, we've watched the video, I can tell you what we think but it doesn't matter what we think because we don't get to present that to the jury anymore."

"We have to ask for this and I'm asking for it. We understand that it's going to be without prejudice...We understand [the state] will do it again. But I think we will all have the same information, the same quality of videos, and I think that is required in a case like this where he's looking at a life sentence, potentially without parole if he's convicted," Chirafisi added.

Advertisement

Schroeder said he will not rule on the motion for a mistrial yet because the jury is still debating and asking about the video in question, but "it will still have to be addressed because the jury saw it here in the courtroom."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement