Disgraced FBI Official Let Chinese Energy Firm Know That They Were Under Federal...
Trump's Executive Order Returns Department of Defense to Its Original Name, But It's...
President Trump Is Right to Bring the G20 to Miami
After Backlash Over 'Deceptive Edits' to Noem Interview, CBS Announces New ‘Face the...
Two Teens Charged as Adults in Killing of Congressional Intern; One Suspect Still...
Leaked Letter Reveals France Preparing Hospitals for Possible War by 2026
Leaked Memo Suggests Biden Outsourced Pardon Power to Kamala Harris
Pritzker Brags About Having 'Moles' Inside Trump Administration
Mamdani Defends Government-Run Grocery Stores Despite Failing Models, $60M Price Tag
Eric Adams Slams Cuomo, Vows to Stay in NYC Mayoral Race to Stop...
ICE to Deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia to Eswatini After Claims of Fear in...
Mamdani: More Continuation Than Aberration for New York
President Trump Is Bringing the Spirit of Sports Back to America
Money, Power and Transgender Ideology
Cleaning Up the Swamp Is a Full-Time Job for Trump
Tipsheet

Kyle Rittenhouse's Defense Team Once Again Asks for a Mistrial But with a Twist

Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News via AP

KENOSHA, Wisc. — Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team once again asked Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder on Wednesday to declare a mistrial but without prejudice, meaning prosecutors could retry Rittenhouse if Schroeder grants the request. The previous time the defense asked for a mistrial, it was with prejudice.

Advertisement

The issue stems from what the defense team says the prosecution withheld video evidence from them and were given only given one version of drone footage the prosecution says proves Rittenhouse provoked Joseph Rosenbaum into chasing him.

"We had the video, not the clarity, not the quality, I think that's been conceded. We have done this case in a little bit different manner...We didn't have the quality of evidence that the state had until the case had been closed," said Corey Chirafisi.

Chirafisi said they consulted with Rittenhouse and they want the mistrial without prejudice, "based upon the fact that if we're really trying to get the heart of it, we've watched the video, I can tell you what we think but it doesn't matter what we think because we don't get to present that to the jury anymore."

"We have to ask for this and I'm asking for it. We understand that it's going to be without prejudice...We understand [the state] will do it again. But I think we will all have the same information, the same quality of videos, and I think that is required in a case like this where he's looking at a life sentence, potentially without parole if he's convicted," Chirafisi added.

Advertisement

Schroeder said he will not rule on the motion for a mistrial yet because the jury is still debating and asking about the video in question, but "it will still have to be addressed because the jury saw it here in the courtroom."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement