Marco Rubio Has Informed Congress That Trump Wants to Buy Greenland
Lindsey Graham Just Told Iran's Regime Exactly What Trump Will Do If It...
Gavin Newsom and His Hair Gel Better Prepare for Some Bad Press After...
Texas Teachers Union Sues Over Investigations Into Posts About Charlie Kirk
Iran's Crown Prince Just Made a Huge Statement Amid Protests Against Islamic Regime
FBI Says It Foiled Another ISIS-Inspired Terrorist Attack at School
Jacob Frey Blames ICE for Fatal Shooting in Minneapolis
Another Member of the Somalian Government Owns a Minnesota 'Healthcare' Company
Keith Ellison Calls Massive Fraud ‘Not Serious’ After Audio of Him Helping Fraudsters...
Report: ICE Agents Involved in Shooting in South Minneapolis
Dr. Oz Puts Tim Walz on Notice Over 'Deep Rot' of Minnesota's Medicaid...
U.S. Also Seized a Sanctioned Dark Fleet Motor Tanker in the Caribbean This...
In Honor of January 6, Gavin Newsom Reminds Everyone He's an Election Denier
Women Beware the 'Judgement-Free Zone'
The Donroe Doctrine: Trump’s Fusion of Prosperity and Power
Tipsheet

Kyle Rittenhouse's Defense Team Once Again Asks for a Mistrial But with a Twist

Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News via AP

KENOSHA, Wisc. — Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team once again asked Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder on Wednesday to declare a mistrial but without prejudice, meaning prosecutors could retry Rittenhouse if Schroeder grants the request. The previous time the defense asked for a mistrial, it was with prejudice.

Advertisement

The issue stems from what the defense team says the prosecution withheld video evidence from them and were given only given one version of drone footage the prosecution says proves Rittenhouse provoked Joseph Rosenbaum into chasing him.

"We had the video, not the clarity, not the quality, I think that's been conceded. We have done this case in a little bit different manner...We didn't have the quality of evidence that the state had until the case had been closed," said Corey Chirafisi.

Chirafisi said they consulted with Rittenhouse and they want the mistrial without prejudice, "based upon the fact that if we're really trying to get the heart of it, we've watched the video, I can tell you what we think but it doesn't matter what we think because we don't get to present that to the jury anymore."

"We have to ask for this and I'm asking for it. We understand that it's going to be without prejudice...We understand [the state] will do it again. But I think we will all have the same information, the same quality of videos, and I think that is required in a case like this where he's looking at a life sentence, potentially without parole if he's convicted," Chirafisi added.

Advertisement

Schroeder said he will not rule on the motion for a mistrial yet because the jury is still debating and asking about the video in question, but "it will still have to be addressed because the jury saw it here in the courtroom."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement