‘Victory Friday’: White House Responds to Victory Over National Injunctions
BREAKING: SCOTUS Rules on Rogue Judges, Impacting Birthright Citizenship
MSNBC Is Melting Down Over the Supreme Court's Birthright Citizenship Ruling
That Is a Brutal Footnote in the Supreme Court's Ruling on Birthright Citizenship
Everything Conservatives Said About Joe Biden Got Exposed One Year Ago Today
The Supreme Court Just Ruled on This State's Pornography Law
In Kennedy v. Braidwood, SCOTUS Upholds ACA’s Preventive-Care Mandate
More Major Food Companies Embrace the MAHA Movement With Latest Announcements
DHS Highlights the 'Worst of the Worst - LA Edition'
Amid Sleeper Cell Threat, Here's How Many Iranian Nationals ICE Arrested in the...
Lawmakers Continue Investigating How the Gov't Is Addressing Drone Incursions on US Milita...
So Book Bans Are Okay Now? San Francisco Store Won't Sell JK Rowling's...
Two Leftist Heroes Have Been Ordered Released From Custody
SCOTUS Hands Down Ruling in Landmark Parental Rights Case
Here's the Shocking Reason Why '160 Democrats' Was Just Trending on X
Tipsheet

Kenosha Judge Calls Out CNN for Knowing Nothing About Wisconsin Law

Mark Hertzberg/Pool Photo via AP

KENOSHA, Wisc. — Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder specifically called out Jeffrey Toobin, CNN's legal analyst, and "another attorney there" on Wednesday as an example of the media's sometimes poor coverage of the ongoing Kyle Rittenhouse trial.

Advertisement

The criticism towards CNN and some of those in the media started after the defense did not want commentary to be aired in a video the prosecution was showing the jury because it was hearsay and the man airing the livestream has not been called up as a witness so they could cross-examine him. Schroeder and Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger then got into a back and forth about the defense wanting to admit evidence about what Joseph Rosenbaum had said and done in the moments leading up to the shooting. Schroeder ruled such evidence could be presented to the jury.

Schroeder said it is critical for the people of Kenosha and the rest of the country to have faith in the final verdict at the end of the trial. 

"I'm gonna comment about the media, again, because there was a gentleman on TV night before last who said, 'This is the most divisive case in the country today'...There are people on the media, on reputable sites, that are saying things that are totally bizarre," he said, adding the reason why he is bringing up CNN is due to how it is a prime example of talking heads making comments about state law they know nothing about, in this case, the "uncommunicated threat rule."

Advertisement

The rule states the defendant does not need to be aware of the deceased past violent actions in order to claim self-defense if circumstantial evidence shows such evidence. Schroeder allowed evidence of Rosenbaum's actions on August 25 to be admitted.

"Now one of these, this was on CNN, Jeffrey Toobin and another attorney there, and a comment was made the ruling was 'incomprehensible.' They obviously are not familiar with this rule. That's our law," Schroeder said.

In response, Binger said he hasn't paid attention to what Toobin has said on the network: "It is of no concern to me."

CNN legal analyst Areva Martin had stated it was "incomprehensible" for Schroeder to prevent the prosecution from calling the men Rittenhouse shot as "victims" but the defense can call the men either arsonists, rioters, or looters if the evidence showed they engaged in such behavior. Schroeder's reasoning for the ban is because if the prosecution calls the men "victims" then it could prejudice the jury when the jury could rule Rittenhouse acted in self-defense, making the men "assailants."

"It's a very troubling situation because ... using that word suggests that Rittenhouse was justified in what he was doing because these were bad people that he shot," Toobin said. "They were committing crimes. They were out there looting. They were out there being arsonists when that is very much in dispute in the trial, what these people were doing."

Advertisement

During the trial's jury selection, Schroeder told potential jurors he was not attacking the media but said there have been instances where stories were written about the Rittenhouse trial by people who knew nothing about the case.

"The price we pay for having a free press is a lot of irresponsible and sloppy journalism," he explained, adding some "reputable" news outlets have been sloppy in their reporting of the case while others have been "perfect" in their reporting.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement