Trump Just Hammered This Democrat Governor for Banning AI Data Centers
After Shooting at Commercial Ships, Iran Threatens Total Shutdown of Middle East Exports
Nick Shirley and Ron Johnson Blow Lid Off Fraud Pipeline That Sent Cash...
Watch This Democrat Candidate Channel Drunken Cheerleader Energy in Cringeworthy Campaign...
Jim Acosta Continues His Obsession With the Reflecting Pool
The UCSF Chancellor Just Admitted Its Transgender Clinic Harms Children
Elissa Slotkin Repeats This Insulting Lie About Married Women Supporting Democrats
A New Poll Shows Socialism Isn't As Popular As the Left Wants Us...
Speaker Mike Johnson Surpasses a Record $135 Million in Fundraising for 2026 Midterms
The Biggest Myth About AI Data Centers Just Fell Apart
New York Just Became the First State to Pass an AI Data Center...
A Venture Capitalist Just Ended the Case for the CA Billionaire Tax
Todd Blanche Is Testifying on Capital Hill Today. Here's What You've Missed.
Adviser to Accused Medicaid Fraudsters Is a Major Donor to Mamdani, Hochul
Tipsheet

Gay Couple Sues Surrogate Mother for Refusing to Abort Child Over Cleft Lip

Gay Couple Sues Surrogate Mother for Refusing to Abort Child Over Cleft Lip
AP Photo/LM Otero, File

A gay couple in Canada is suing their surrogate for nearly $600,000 after she refused to abort the now 2-year-old child because of potential birth defects. The lawsuit, obtained by the National Post, says that the couple agreed to continue the pregnancy after more tests — ordered by the surrogate — revealed the child was healthy with only a minor birth defect, a cleft lip. The woman was 22-weeks along at the time. Two years later, however, the couple is claiming they were victims of emotional distress because their surrogate failed to properly inform them of the child's health, violating confidentiality and putting the child at risk. 

Advertisement

Upon initially learning of the potential birth defect following an ultrasound, the couple sent a letter to the surrogate expressing their desire to have the child aborted:

“Considering that medical tests indicate that the fetus has, or is likely to have, a genetic, chromosomal or other abnormality or defect, and in accordance with article 8.5 (a) of our surrogacy agreement … we want to inform you of our wish that the pregnancy be terminated,” the gay couple wrote. “Although very difficult, this decision is free and informed.”

According to the surrogate and the surrogate agency, the abortion demand permanently damaged the relationship between the surrogate and the couple, neither of whom are named in the report. While the couple did end up choosing to proceed with the pregnancy, tensions flared once again over the birth plan. The woman filed a reimbursement claim for the out-of-pocket expenses tied to the pregnancy and home-birth costs. The couple reportedly did not cover the costs because they wanted a hospital birth. She learned her small claim required arbitration before she was hit with the full civil suit over the abortion debacle.

Advertisement

According to the woman, she had matched with dozens of families on the surrogacy site before deciding on the gay couple whom she had gotten along with well before receiving the abortion request letter in June 2024. 

Unlike in the U.S. where surrogates charge commercial fees, Canadian surrogates can only be reimbursed for receipted expenses, which many women never receive. 

"I just feel used...They didn’t get the perfect child they wanted and they threw me away,” the woman told the Post. "You know I’m a single mom, you know I have a daughter, and you’re basically suing me for my house." 

Sally Rhoads-Heinrich, the owner of the surrogacy company, commented on the situation. "What I find most difficult in this is they are suing the woman who brought their son to them,” she said. “How is their son going to feel some day if he learns that?”

Surrogacy often results in intense legal disputes between couples and surrogates, diminishing the child's life to nothing more than a contract. This has even left some children orphaned while their custody is determined. Children born through surrogacy too often become viewed as commodities instead of the precious, new life that they are. The child still remains in the custody of the homosexual couple, who declined to comment on the story.

Advertisement

Editor’s Note: Every single day, here at Townhall, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical Left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its successes. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos