Scott Jennings Slaps Down All Who Tried to Shame Him for Being a...
ReSIsT FaScIsM: Dem Governor Told Hordes of State Government Workers They're Being Laid...
Hey DOJ, How About Growing Up And Doing Your Damn Jobs?
Now They Care? Democrats Suddenly Get Loud About Epstein Files After Four Years...
DOJ Drops Bombshell Report on Federal Prisons—The Details Are Quite Disturbing
God Saved President Trump for a Reason One Year Ago
The Deep State Wins Again
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 276: Moses in the New Testament Gospels
Meet the New Grok, Same as the Old Grok
Will John Brennan Finally be Indicted?
Diplomacy or Disaster? Is Secretary Rubio Dismantling or Rebuilding America’s State Depart...
God Did Not Play Dice With Donald Trump's Life
Trump Breaks Silence on Alleged Bondi–Bongino Clash
Trump Unleashes 30 Percent Tariffs on Mexico, EU: Hits Back at Cartels, Trade...
DHS Shreds NYT’s False Claims Regarding Texas Floods
Tipsheet

The Curious Case of Sen. Jeff Sessions’ Earmark

6 Something called the Generalized System of Preferences has recently allowed for the duty-free import of certain products from developing nations, including inexpensive sleeping bags from Bangladesh. Lo and behold, there is only one American company that makes sleeping bags at a similar price point and quality: an Alabama company called Exxel Outdoors.
Advertisement


Exxel’s profits have plummeted as companies have begun importing the sleeping bags under the GSP. These bags are imported essentially duty-free, and if allowed to continue, will put Exxel out of business. So Exxel asked Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama to close the loophole, and remove the GSP from imported sleeping bags.

John Stanton at Roll Call explains:
Earlier this year, Sessions sought to include language in the renewal of the GSP to close the loophole and save Exxel’s Alabama plant, but he has been unable to reach an agreement with Democrats and Republicans, who are pushing to pass the bill as is.

After numerous proposals to address the situation, Sessions opted to place a hold on the bill, which at this late date in the session means the GSP is likely to lapse at the end of the year.

Sessions flatly denies the provision he is seeking is an earmark. His office claimed he is trying to undo an old earmark.
Is it an earmark? Sessions is seeking a special exemption for a company in his state, who stands to gain a lot of business by the government intervening. There’s no government outlay, persay, but Stanton explains how what Sessions is seeking fits the technical definition of an earmark.
Advertisement

…the [earmark] rules require the disclosure of any “congressionally directed spending items, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits.” Limited tariff benefits are specifically defined by Senate rules as “a provision modifying the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States in a manner that benefits 10 or fewer entities.”
And then there’s Sessions’ explanation, via his spokesman:
Sen. Sessions is trying to end that injustice, and eliminate that earmark, by ensuring that Bangladesh and China have to play by the same rules as everyone else in the world. He is fighting to close a gaping loophole in our trade laws so that companies in America are at least allowed to compete on the same playing field.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement