Don't Miss This VERY Special Black Friday Offer
Trump: Anything Signed by Biden's Autopen Is Hereby Revoked
Is This the Greatest Trump Post of All Time?
Here's What Happened to the DOJ Worker Who Doxxed an ICE Agent
CNN's Top Legal Analyst Explains Why the Georgia Case Got Tossed. Libs Won't...
Watch Trump Totally Cook This Reporter Over This Stupid Question
Trump Announces Major Move to Prevent Future Terrorist Attacks
Appeals Court Rules Against Donald Trump and Alina Habba, Upholds $1 Million Judgment...
Guess What This IL College Will Do to Students Who Follow Federal Law
Aftyn Behn's Anti-Law Enforcement Rhetoric Goes Far Beyond Defunding the Police
The American Soup Kitchen Is Officially Closed
Boston Mayor Says She Isn’t 'Interested in a Bromance With the Federal Regime'
Woman Linked to Karoline Leavitt’s Family Taken Into ICE Custody
Heartland America: After the Collapse of Democrat’s EV Socialism, Bipartisan Protectionism...
California Man Arraigned for Making Bomb Threats to Synagogues
Tipsheet

Bills Introduced Requiring Sanctuary Cities to Repay Feds for Sending in Troops

AP Photo/John Raoux

New bills have been introduced in both the Senate and House that would require states to repay the federal government, should the feds have to use military resources to respond to any “civil disturbances” resulting from the state’s  “refusal to cooperate with lawful Federal immigration enforcement.”

Advertisement

The Senate bill was introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and the House bill was introduced by Rep. Jody Arrington (R-TX). 

The idea was in response to riots across Los Angeles about ICE raids. The riots forced President Trump to send in thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines in order to protect federal personnel and property.

“As lawless states like California obstruct the federal government’s work to enforce immigration law, American taxpayers in other states have been forced to foot the bill for the military forces required to quell the chaos and protect law-abiding citizens. If a state refuses to do its job and forces the federal government to respond to unrest, they should pay for it,” Blackburn told The Daily Wire.

The bill, titled “State Accountability for Federal Deployment Costs Act,” would “send a message that refusing to comply with federal immigration law will not be tolerated,” Blackburn said. 

Regarding the House bill, Arrington said that “[S]anctuary policies that obstruct federal law enforcement jeopardize communities and drain valuable resources – in fact, their very existence is a violation of the law. It’s entirely unacceptable for states that refuse to enforce immigration laws to expect taxpayers in states like Texas and Tennessee to foot the bill when the consequences of their lawlessness results in federal action. I’m proud to team up with Senator Blackburn to ensure that states that break the law, pay the price.”

Advertisement

Related:

MARSHA BLACKBURN

The bill says that if a military response is required to deal with state authorities not cooperating with federal immigration enforcement operations, the state would be on the hook for the travel, meals, lodging, and other expenses incurred by the mobilized federal troops.

The attorney general and secretary of Homeland Security would be the ones to determine if the state’s actions led to the conditions requiring the troops. The state must make a payment within 180 days of receiving a reimbursement request from the Department of Defense, or risk the president rescinding discretionary grants to said state.

Editor’s Note: Every single day, here at Townhall, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its successes. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement