CNN's Kaitlan Collins Is Infuriated That No One Cares About Trump Blasting Dems...
CNN's Scott Jennings Couldn’t Let This Schumer Shutdown Lie Slide
Wait, a Dem Rep Really Said This About Trump During the Schumer Shutdown
The Latest Sombrero-Mariachi Responses to the Schumer Shutdown Are Gold
No Apologies: Proud to Stand With Israel, Proud to Defend the West
Trump Posted a New Clip Trolling Hakeem Jeffries...and Another That's Really Going to...
Democrats Thought They Had the Upper Hand in the Schumer Shutdown. WaPo Says...
Qatar Is Bankrolling Global Terror—and It’s a Direct Threat to the West
Let's Stop Pretending About Charlie Kirk's Assassination
Empty Lives
Amidst Concerns About Left-Wing Lawfare, States Should Review Who They Have on Contract...
It’s Time to Choose Cooperation Over Continued Chaos
Talking Point vs. Truth
Direct Democracy Can Save Younger Generations From Penury
Duty Drawback Benefits American Manufacturers and Exporters
Tipsheet

Question of Illegal Aliens Having Second Amendment Rights Goes to Appeals Court

AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli

The Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals will hear the question of whether illegal aliens have Second Amendment rights, in the case USA v. Heriberto Carbajal-Flores.

Advertisement

The case regards Flores’ arrest in Chicago for having a firearm.

Margaret Steindorf, who represents the federal government in the case, said Flores’ immigration status is important, stating that “[T]here is the common thread here of felons not abiding by the law and those unlawfully in the country also not authorized to be in the country” when arguing court precedent for certain people to not be allowed to possess a firearm.

Jacob Briskman, representing Flores, said however that the rights granted to “the people” don’t only apply to certain amendments in the Constitution, stating that “[T]he [U.S.] Supreme Court has decided that undocumented folks have First Amendment protections, Fourth Amendment protections, Fifth Amendment protections when they have come within the United States and developed substantial ties,” and added that Flores’s wife and children are citizens of the United States.

Advertisement

However, having a gun wasn’t Flores’s only crime, Steindorf argued, adding that “[T]he district court erred when it found defendant was non-violent when in fact the defendant shot a firearm seven times at a passing car without provocation and tried to shoot at a second passing car shortly thereafter.”

Briskman argued that Flores still should have Second Amendment rights regardless, saying that “[S]tripping people of Second Amendment rights because of a criminal history or because they are not responsible are not supported by case law, as [recent U.S. Supreme Court precedent in United States v.] Rahimi has shown.”

The case was taken by the appeals court under advisement.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos