These Latest Polls Are Disastrous for Dems
John Cornyn Just Proved Why He Sucks With These Remarks Over SAVE America...
'My God. Read the Replies. Horrendous': This Tweet Ends Fauci's Legacy
President Trump and Others Bid Farewell to 'Tough Cookie' Lindsey Graham at Memorial...
The Atlantic Begs Judge to Drop Kash Patel's Defamation Lawsuit
Dems Like Swalwell Drain Donor Cash to Smear Sex Accusers – This Bill...
Georgia Cop Arrested for Stalking Boyfriend With Mass Surveillance Cameras
US Diplomats Storm Out of UN Meeting After France's Disgusting Attack on Trump...
Guess What Happened to the WI Brewery That Vowed Free Beer If Trump...
Where's That Affordability? Check Out What Arlington, VA Is Doing to EV Owners.
California Lifeguard to Be Honored at White House Following Incredible Ocean Rescue
Anti-Catholic Vandal Strikes Catholic Holy Site of Medjugorje
Anthony Fauci: Dr. Wrong
Meet the Fauci Enablers Asking for a Promotion
Tipsheet

Democrat Who Begged to Kill Filibuster Now Begs to Save It From GOP

Democrat Who Begged to Kill Filibuster Now Begs to Save It From GOP
AP Photo/Tom Brenner

Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) has reversed his position on abolishing the filibuster as Senate Republicans work to pass the SAVE America Act.

Fetterman penned an op-ed on Tuesday for The Washington Post in which he advocates for preserving the practice after he argued in favor of eliminating it when Democrats had control of the upper chamber.

Advertisement

“When Democrats had the presidency and a majority in both chambers, they were frustrated with the 60-vote threshold needed to advance legislation,” the senator wrote. “Senate Democrats attempted to end the filibuster to push through President Joe Biden’s agenda — an effort I fully supported during my 2022 campaign.”

But now, Fetterman said he recognizes “how important the filibuster is and the state our country would be in without it.”

I thought ending the filibuster was necessary to deliver results for working families. I thought it was unlikely for Republicans in the minority to find common ground on legislation Democrats were proposing. I thought Democrats were not being ruthless the way Republicans were, and we needed to be on that level if we were going to relieve the anger that voters were feeling.

Upon reflection, the pursuit of those short-term wins clouded the bigger picture and lasting impact of a Senate without the filibuster — a Senate that ignored the voices of the minority and everyday people.

History has vindicated former senators Kyrsten Sinema (Arizona) and Joe Manchin III (West Virginia), two people who were vilified by the Democratic Party for their support of the filibuster and whose courageous efforts damaged their political careers. The rule is a critical line of defense that prevents President Donald Trump from having a fill-in-the-blank government with new laws, deregulation or procedures of its choosing.

Advertisement

Fetterman further notes that Senate Democrats were able to pass the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and other types of legislation even with the filibuster intact and that they “could not have passed these important pieces of legislation along party lines and had to work across the aisle.”

He noted that Republicans winning back control of the Senate “quickly showed how chaotic a simple majority vote could be in the Senate” and that “if Americans are horrified now, imagine what could be law today if Democrats had eliminated the filibuster.”

The senator referred to the SAVE America Act, which he opposes, and argues that “We could have extreme policies such as nationwide abortion restrictions, backpedaling on LGBT rights, repeal of birthright citizenship and limited voting rights across the country.”

He concludes by arguing that the filibuster is “one of the best features of the Senate” because it forces Republicans and Democrats to work together.

When Democrats held the presidency and a Senate majority under President Joe Biden, most members of the party sought to abolish or weaken the legislative filibuster to advance their agenda over Republican opposition.

Advertisement

If it were any other Democrat reversing course on the filibuster, I’d assume they were motivated by political expediency. That could still be true of Fetterman. But the fact that he has often bucked his party based on the principles he espouses, it’s also possible this is a sincere plea.

Still, his fellow Democrats won’t agree with him on this. President Donald Trump has insisted repeatedly that whenever Democrats regain the Senate, they will eliminate the filibuster, which is why he is pressuring Senate Republicans to preempt them on this.

Either way, the filibuster is on borrowed time. Either Republicans will abolish it, or they will see Democrats kill it the moment they have the chance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement