Prosecutors Slap Another Blue State Official With Bribery Charges
Blue States Score Major Court Victory Over Trump Administration Thanks to Obama-Appointed...
Inside the Trump Administration's Plan to Protect Citizenship
Trump-Appointed Judge Blasts DHS' Handling of Illegal Immigrant Detainees
Keith Ellison Compared the Minnesota ICE Surge to What?
The SAFE-T Act Set Violent Illegal Immigrant Loose. Thankfully ICE Has Arrested Him.
Let's Talk About That Irish Immigrant Detained by ICE That the Left Can't...
CBS Evening News Producer Penned Tone Deaf Resignation Letter. Here's What It Said.
Unhinged Anti-ICE Agitator Allegedly Points Shotgun at Driver
Newsom's Wife Hijacks a Press Conference to Scold Reporters for Not Asking About...
NYC Gets a Free Grocery Store, but It's a Slap in the Face...
BLM Activist Turned Conservative Commentator Defends Mass Incarceration: It's Very Easy to...
CNN's Harry Enten Reveals That the Far-Left is Now a Considerable Force in...
Trump Terminates Protected Status for Yemeni Migrants After Scoring Major Court Victory
Tipsheet

Gun Accessory Company Agrees to $1.75 Million Settlement With Families of Buffalo Shooting Victims

Gun Accessory Company Agrees to $1.75 Million Settlement With Families of Buffalo Shooting Victims
AP Photo/Joshua Bessex

A firearm accessory company has agreed to pay out a massive settlement to the families of the racially-motivated mass shooting at a supermarket in New York.

This comes after New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against Mean Arms, a gun accessory company. At the center of the lawsuit is a part the company sells that can be removed so that the user can use “high-capacity” magazines in their rifle. This is what the gunman who targeted black New Yorkers at Tops Supermarket in Buffalo did before carrying out the shooting.

Advertisement

From NBC News:

The agreement with Georgia-based Mean Arms settles a lawsuit filed by James and covers claims from various victims’ families and survivors of the 2022 attack at Tops Friendly Market. They also reached agreements to resolve their own separate suits against gunman Payton Gendron’s family and a gun seller, Vintage Firearms LLC, the plaintiffs’ lawyers announced Wednesday.

The claims against Mean Arms focused on an item that locks a magazine onto a rifle. The lock is supposed to keep people from swapping in high-capacity magazines, which are illegal in New York.

But according to James, Gendron easily removed the lock from an AR-15-style rifle and was able to add high-capacity magazines. She also said the company provided step-by-step instructions on the back of its product packaging on how to remove the lock.

“We hope that by holding this manufacturer accountable and banning it from selling this device in New York state, we can offer the people of Buffalo some measure of comfort,” James, a Democrat, said at a news conference in the city.

Advertisement

Everytown for Gun Safety, an anti-gunner organization that represented some of the survivors and victims’ relatives, celebrated the settlement in a statement. “Everytown’s partnership with the New York Attorney General’s Office led to the first lawsuit to hold Mean Arms accountable, filed on the one year anniversary of the shooting, and then was followed by multiple private lawsuits naming Mean as well,” the organization said.

On May 14, 2022, an 18-year-old white supremacist traveled to the supermarket, which was located in a predominantly black neighborhood. He opened fire using a AR-15 rifle, killing ten people and wounding three others in a racially motivated hate crime. He reportedly had researched prior racist shootings and posted a 180-page manifesto featuring several racist statements.

The anti-gunners pounced on the opportunity to use the racial aspect of the shooting to push for gun control — even though the history of gun control has been racist from its inception.

This case represents another front in the anti-gunners’ war against the Second Amendment, which makes it difficult for them to prevent people from keeping and bearing arms. If they can’t rely on laws, they will use lawfare against gun companies. Their hope is that by forcing these companies to spend money on lawsuits, they can put at least some of them out of business. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos