Good Riddance to the Awful Thomas Massie
The Freak Out Over Demi Moore Being in Shape Is Stupid
Steak ’n Shake Is Serving up MAHA
Let's Not Forget About Left-Wing Violence
AOC, Ice Cream, and Veggies
Feeding the Government Pig
Victims Everywhere
Gavin Newsom Has a Kamala Harris Problem
What Regular Folks Want — and Why the Left Keeps Getting It Wrong
Why the Nevada State Treasurer Race Matters
Sanders Invites China’s AI Czars to Washington—and Waves the Flag of AI Surrender
James Blair's Victory
China Is Not Merely a Competitor — It Is Fueling America's Enemies
IRS Handouts to Noncitizens: Your Tax Dollars Funding the Wrong Team
Six-Month Freeze: CMS Blocks New Medicare Enrollments for Hospice and Home Health Agencies...
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Issues Predictable Ruling on Letitia James and James Comey

Federal Judge Issues Predictable Ruling on Letitia James and James Comey
AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey

A federal judge has thrown out the Justice Department’s prosecutions against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

The DOJ indicted Comey for allegedly lying to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding. James was accused of mortgage fraud for allegedly providing false information about several homes she owns on mortgage applications. Both individuals have been vocal critics of President Donald Trump, with James leading a lawsuit against Trump’s companies alleging fraud.

Advertisement

Senior U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie dismissed the indictments against Comey and James on Monday. He determined that the appointment of Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan was unlawful. The judge concluded that “the Attorney General’s attempt to install Ms. Halligan as Interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia was invalid,” which means she had no lawful authority to indict Comey and James.

The court explained that the process for appointing an interim U.S. Attorney is limited by statute. After a previous interim U.S. Attorney’s term expires, only the district court—not the Attorney General—possesses the authority to appoint a new official to this position.

The judge rejected the Justice Department’s argument that Attorney General Pam Bondi could retroactively appoint Halligan to address the problem.

Advertisement

The court concluded that Halligan’s actions were “unlawful exercises of executive power and must be set aside” and dismissed arguments that it could be remedied after the fact. 

However, Currie dismissed both cases without prejudice, meaning the DOJ could reindict them after Halligan’s position is filled.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement