Oh, So That's Who Signed Off on the FBI Spy Operation Into the...
Chuck Schumer Is About to Be Taken Behind the Barn Over This Tweet
Watch Trump Roast a Reporter Over This Silly Question About the East Room...
Trump Just Called Off Planned Immigration 'Surge' In This City – for Now
Trump Administration Is Preparing Unprecedented Action Against Drug Cartels
Some Democrats Are Sour on Mandela Barnes Running for Wisconsin Governor
Vance Bridges Faith and Diplomacy: Visits Church of the Holy Sepulchre Amid Peace...
Famous Berlin Drag Queen Under Investigation for Child Porn
NJ Democrat Councilman Calls ICE an 'Invasive Species,' Says Agency Should Be Eliminated
Another Day, Another Blow to Platner's Image
Anti-ICE Protestor Who Called for Violence a 'Human Rights Award' Winner
Candace Owens Hits a New Low, and Accuses Trump of Assassinating Charlie Kirk
Eric Adams Endorses Andrew Cuomo
NYC Gubernatorial Candidates Trade Blows Over Scandals in Heated Exchange
Jack Smith Justifies His Secret Subpoenas, Republicans Aren’t Buying It
Tipsheet

Here We Go Again: Another Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Effort to Rein in Spending

AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

A federal judge on Wednesday blocked the Trump administration’s efforts to slash nearly $12 billion in foreign aid that Congress previously approved.

US District Judge Amir Ali, a Biden appointee, ruled that the White House violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the main law Democrats have relied on to mount legal challenges against President Donald Trump’s policies.

Advertisement

The legal battle started when Trump issued an executive order shortly after taking office to “pause” all foreign aid. Several nonprofits, including the Global Health Council and the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, sued the administration, arguing that the order violated the law and threatened their operations overseas.

Judge Ali agreed, arguing that the administration’s failure to spend the funds “is contrary to law in violation of the APA” and was “arbitrary and capricious.”

The judge noted that Congress explicitly directed the executive branch to spend these funds under the 2024 appropriations act. It designated funds for global health initiatives, democracy programs, and disaster assistance. However, the Trump administration refused to spend the money and allowed the funds to expire without congressional approval. Ali claimed the administration did not provide any justification to “displace the bedrock expectation that Congress’s appropriations must be followed.”

Ali further stated that withholding the funds was “completely independent of whether Defendants have complied or failed to comply with the ICA’s requirements.”

The judge rejected the administration’s arguments that the rescissions package passed earlier this year meant that federal agencies were not obligated to distribute the funds. Ali wrote, “absent Congress acting to rescind the appropriations, nothing in the ICA permits Defendants to withhold congressionally appropriated funds to run out the clock.”

Advertisement

He granted preliminary injunctions and partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, insisting that they had legal standing because the freeze jeopardized their funding and missions. 

“This case raises questions of immense legal and practical importance, including whether there is any avenue to test the executive branch’s decision not to spend congressionally appropriated funds,” Ali wrote.

The Trump administration appealed Ali’s ruling on Thursday, according to Reuters. This case will likely go to the Supreme Court to determine whether the executive branch has the authority to unilaterally cut foreign aid. 

Editor's Note: Radical leftist judges are doing everything they can to hamstring President Trump's agenda to make America great again.

Help us hold these corrupt judges accountable for their unconstitutional rulings. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos