Trump Explains How the Situation in Gaza Can Immediately End
The MAGA Agenda Is on the Line
There’s a Reason Why the Durham Annex Was in Those FBI Burn Bags
Silly Protesters Bring Coffin to GOP Lawmaker’s House to Protest 'Death to Democracy'
This Democrat Lawmaker Wants You to Believe the CIA Is Totally Harmless
Josh Hawley Is in Big Trouble With Trump After Siding With Democrats on...
Another Ivy League University Bends the Knee to Trump Administration
Trump Holds the Line—Mexico Drops Trade Barriers to Avoid Tariff Spike
Whistleblower Says They Were Ordered to Push Obama’s Russia Lie—They Refused
Jake Tapper Asks Pelosi About Insider Trading—She Completely Loses It
This European Country Won’t Support Recognizing Palestinian State
Newest White House Addition Will Require Your Dancing Shoes
Trump Blasts Canada For Recognizing Palestinian State
Trump to Revive This Fitness Program in Public Schools
Celsius Spike or Hard Seltzer? High Noon Issues Recall
Tipsheet

Jasmine Crockett Deposits Her Foot Into Her Mouth Again

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

If there is one thing we should never assume, it’s that Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) can’t get any more clueless.

Remember, Crockett was the one who emphatically argued that former President Joe Biden was in full control of his faculties and was not at all suffering from cognitive decline. Now, during a recent interview with journalist Katie Couric, she is trying to gaslight the public once again.

Advertisement

During the conversation, Crockett complained that American voters would have rather jumped into a pool full of bloodthirsty piranhas than vote for former Vice President Kamala Harris. 

“When you think about it, Kamala Harris, light years ahead of Donald Trump as it relates to qualifications, as it relates to her overall resume, and as it relates to the fact that she was a lot younger,” she said. “Everybody said that they wanted to get rid of Joe Biden because he was too old. Then you had a younger, qualified, non-felon candidate, and somehow the people still chose the old White man. So for me, I don't think it was ever about that.”

Yes, Harris was the younger candidate, and America is tired of old men running the country — but pretending as if this would be the primary factor influencing people’s voting decisions is about as smart as mud wrestling with a silverback gorilla.

Despite her relative youth, Harris was clearly a deeply flawed candidate, as one user on X pointed out.

Advertisement

Here’s the thing. American voters were concerned about their pocketbooks. Given the Biden/Harris administration’s failure to rein in inflation, it makes sense that people wouldn’t want to vote for more of the same. Moreover, the former administration’s lax approach to immigration didn’t exactly win them any points.

In light of this, Trump might have still won even if he was one hundred years old. Instead of blaming voters for ther choices, perhaps Democrats should actually try to figure out where they went wrong. Of course, this is unlikely to happen because it is far easier to blame racism and sexism and whatever else they can come up with to explain why they got absolutely wrecked in 2024.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement