Uh Oh: New Poll Shows Voters Are Starting to Blame Dems for the...
Why Dems Aren't Throwing a Fit Over This Trump Move During the Schumer...
Here's How the Supreme Court Is Leaning on the Voting Rights Act Case
This Is Why Airports Are Refusing to Air Kristi Noem's Schumer Shutdown Video
Scott Jennings Takes a Victory Lap on Illegal Immigrants Receiving Medicaid
California Democratic Gubernatorial Candidate Betty Yee Calls for 'Gender Neutral' LA Olym...
Virginia Rep. Eugene Vindman Plans to Attend Fundraiser for Jay Jones
Dems Question Legality of President Trump Helping Americans Weather the Schumer Shutdown
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth's Plane Makes Unscheduled Landing in the UK
Principal Deputy Solicitor General Silences Justice Sotomayor in Louisiana Redistricting S...
Mayor Wu Responds to President Trump's Threat to Pull World Cup Games Out...
Kantanji Brown Jackson Proves Once Again She is Not Qualified to Sit on...
Israel Says Hamas Returned Wrong Body in Hostage Exchange
Some of the Government Should Shut Down For Good
Minnesota AG Ellison Snubs Veterans in Viral Memorial Arrival Video
Tipsheet

Can Congress Stop Democrats' Lawfare Against Trump's Policies? This Lawmaker Thinks So.

AP Photo/Ben Curtis

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) announced on Thursday that he plans to introduce legislation to stop the use of lawfare to stymie President Donald Trump’s agenda.

The senator in a post on X said, “District Court judges have issued RECORD numbers of national injunctions against the Trump administration – a dramatic abuse of judicial authority.”

Advertisement

During an appearance on conservative podcaster Charlie Kirk’s show, Hawley said district and federal courts are saying they are “just going to issue an order that says what the executive branch can or cannot do in my district, I’m going to issue an order that binds the executive branch for the entire nation.”

Either the Supreme Court needs to intervene and make clear there's only one court that can issue rules for the whole country, that's the Supreme Court, that's why we only have one of them. And or, if they won't do that, Congress needs to legislate and make clear that district courts do not have the ability to issue these kinds of injunctions.

Indeed, Democrats have taken to using the court system to hamper Trump’s policies since they do not control either chamber of Congress. Most recently, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ordered the Trump administration not to deport over 200 Venezuelan illegal immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act. However, the plan was already in the air when he issued the order, so the illegals, many of whom were suspected members of the Tren de Aragua gang, still made it to El Salvador, where they are being housed in a maximum security facility.

Advertisement

Another judge recently blocked Trump’s executive order banning trans-identified individuals from the military.

These are only a few of the lawsuits Democrats have filed against the Trump administration. These efforts are expected to keep the courts quite busy as the White House fights back against the legal onslaught.

At first glance, what Hawley is proposing sounds like a good and reasonable idea. After all, how much power should the judiciary have when it comes to checking the executive branch?

However, this type of legislation could easily be used against Republicans when Democrats eventually regain power. Indeed, while former President Joe Biden was in office, he faced similar challenges when trying to implement certain policies.

U.S. District Judge Drew Tipton, based in Texas, issued a national injunction on the Biden White House’s 100-day moratorium on deportations. The administration was eventually forced to abandon the policy.

Another judge blocked Biden’s executive order halting new oil and gas leases on federal lands in 2021. The ruling came after a lawsuit filed by 13 GOP-led states claiming that the move would harm their economies.

The same judge also issued an injunction against Biden’s executive order mandating the COVID-19 vaccine for healthcare workers at facilities that receive Medicare and Medicaid funds. Red states argued that this move exceeded federal authority.

Advertisement

There are plenty of instances in which judges have rightly stopped a president from issuing sweeping executive orders. Of course, as we have seen so far, there are times when a judge’s ability to issue nationwide orders goes wrong. But even then, the matter can and will be litigated in court. In many of these situations, the Trump administration stands a good chance of winning the overall legal battles.

Eliminating this ability would free up the president to enact his agenda. But it would also make it easier for future Democratic presidents to push theirs as well, which won’t exactly be good for the country.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos