Here's What Trump Said About the New York Knicks After They Won Their...
How Trump Reacted When That UFC Fighter Took a 'Nasty' Swipe at Michelle...
Did Hakeem Jeffries Think He Was Safe on This Show? He Got Bulldozed
Brazilian Woman Who Got Tossed Off a Bridge Without Bungee Cord Wasn't Killed...
My Biggest Fear About This Iran Agreement
Trump Faces Another Lawsuit From a Bunch of DC losers Over Planned Garden...
The Hollywood ‘Counter-Programming’ to the Fights At the White House Was Pathetic
Energy Commission Moves to Lower Prices for Americans
'It's Only a Matter of National Security': America's Workforce Academy's Mission to Fill...
Who Really Won—or Is Winning—the American-Persian War?
You Can't Always Want What You Get
America Still Loves the Flag. It Just Doesn't Trust the People Running the...
The Fallout in LA From Pratt's Fall
World Cup Fever Stirs High School Soccer Memories
Trump's Iran Deal – Peace in Our Time or a Dangerous Illusion?
Tipsheet

Here's Why Trump Is Suing a Well-Known Pollster

Here's Why Trump Is Suing a Well-Known Pollster
Brandon Bell/Pool via AP

 

President-elect Donald Trump is suing pollster J. Ann Selzer, her polling firm, the Des Moines Register, and its parent company, Gannett, alleging that they participated in “election interference” under the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act.

Advertisement

The lawsuit alleges that a November 2, 2024, poll showing Vice President Kamala Harris leading Trump in Iowa by three points was intended to mislead voters and create a false narrative in favor of Democrats. The president-elect ended up winning the state by 13 points.

Trump’s attorneys argue that this poll was manipulated to artificially boost Harris’ campaign by making it appear it had a level of momentum that it did not have. “Defendants and their cohorts in the Democrat Party hoped that the Harris Poll would create a false narrative of inevitability for Harris in the final week of the 2024 Presidential Election,” the lawsuit claims, according to Fox News.

“The Harris Poll was no ‘miss’ but rather an attempt to influence the outcome of the 2024 Presidential Election,” the lawsuit states, adding that “defendants and their cohorts in the Democrat Party hoped that the Harris Poll would create a false narrative of inevitability for Harris in the final week of the 2024 Presidential Election.”

“Instead, the November 5 election was a monumental victory for President Trump in both the Electoral College and the Popular Vote, an overwhelming mandate for his America First principles, and the consignment of the radical socialist agenda to the dustbin of history.”

The lawsuit notes that Selzer, after more than 35 years in the industry, “retired in disgrace from polling less than two weeks after this embarrassing rout.”

Trump lawyers argued that “left-wing pollsters have attempted to influence electoral outcomes through manipulated polls that have unacceptable error rates and are not grounded in widely accepted polling methodologies.”

Advertisement

Selzer’s final poll, published three days before Election Day, showed Harris leading Trump 47 percent to 44 percent despite Iowa being a deep red state.

Trump’s attorneys characterized Selzer’s poll as “election-interfering fiction” that deceived the voting public and harmed the president-elect’s campaign strategy.

“Millions of Americans, including Plaintiff, residents of Iowa, and Iowans who contributed to President Trump’s Campaign and its affiliated entities … were deceived by the doctored Harris Poll,” the lawsuit states.

The lawsuit claims the poll violates the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act, arguing that it caused “substantial, unavoidable injury” to consumers, donors, and the Trump campaign.

Trump's attorneys noted that “While Selzer Selzer is not the only pollster to engage in this corrupt practice, she had a huge platform and following and, thus, a significant and impactful opportunity to deceive voters.”

Trump will be receiving a $15 million settlement from ABC News after he sued the network for defamation. The lawsuit centered on claims made by anchor and former Clinton operative George Stephanopoulos about the president being found liable for rape when that was not the court’s finding.

Advertisement

Several legal experts said ABC News’ decision to settle the case was a smart move. Attorney Danny Karon, a law professor, told Fox News, “As dumb as George Stephanopoulos was to lie on air about Trump’s civil verdict, ABC News was that smart to settle.”

He added: “It settled now because Trump and George Stephanopoulos were scheduled to be deposed this week. Whether it’s a function of discomfort, scheduling, or timing, no one likes to be deposed.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement