How is Trump's Latest Trucking Mandate Not the Norm?
Newsom Accused of Vote Trading and Bribery During Redistricting Scheme
About That Illegal Who Was Ripped Out of His Car by Federal Agents...
It's Done: Texas Finally Passes New Congressional Maps
You're Gonna Laugh Your Head Off at Texas Democrats' Latest Redistricting Stunt
Administrative State Ruins Farmer's Business, Then Gets Shellacked in Court
CBS Dodged a Self-Fired Bullet,
LOOK! I GOT MY GENDER AFFIRMATION SCOUT BADGE!
Lyons: ICE Finally Allowed to Do Its Job Under Trump’s Second Term
U.S. Deploys Warships to Venezuela in Trump’s Cartel Crackdown
Stephen Miller Has a Message for Those Protesting Trump's Crackdown on D.C. Crime
8 Sentenced for Stealing $17M in COVID Relief Funds
Good Guys in Michigan With Guns, Trucks, Defend Church, Walmarts Over 2025 Summer
Trump Calls on Fed Governor to Resign Over Mortgage Fraud Allegations
Detroit Hedge Fund Manager Gets 100 Months in Prison for $39M in Wire...
Tipsheet

Do Republicans Have a Decent Shot at Defying History in the Midterms?

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

If history is any guide, Democrats should enter next fall's midterm election cycle with a distinct advantage.  Generally, the opposition party fares well in these contests -- sometimes very well.  Looking back over the past two decades, for instance, four of the last five midterm cycles have resulted in waves (blue in 2006, 2018; red in 2010 and 2014).  But in 2022, Democrats over-performed expectations and held the GOP to a 'red trickle,' which was still sufficient for Republicans to take back the House, but just barely.  Given the tiny margins in both Congressional chambers right now, even a similar trickle next year would probably be enough to hand Democrats the gavel in at least the House of Representatives.  This is especially true, in light of Democrats' recently-established and -demonstrated structural advantage in lower-turnout elections.  Their base shows up, faithfully.  Republicans have started to rely more heavily on lower-propensity voters to win, which presents a challenging proposition in non-'Super Bowl' presidential years.  

Advertisement

That said, there are some extremely early indications that 2026 isn't shaping up like either 2006 or 2018.  We've written about a few of them recently, including some heartening numbers in the chase for dollars:


There's also this way-too-early (but perhaps still somewhat useful on trend-spotting) polling analysis that made the rounds a few weeks ago:


NBC's data guru also sees some major distinctions between terrible bloodbath years for Republicans and what appears to be brewing in 2026:


"The makeup of that Republican majority that got decimated in 2018 [net 40 seats lost] is very different than the makeup of the Republican majority right now," Kornacki told viewers, explaining that many more House Republicans in that previous cycle represented districts carried by Hillary Clinton in 2016 (25 seats in 2018), compared to those who hold seats in Harris-won seats today (just three seats).  "Republicans have fewer overall seats now, but there are more Republicans in truly safe 'Trump landslide' districts," he said of the 2026 map.  He also noted that if the red states of Texas and Ohio go through a redistricting process to draw Democrats out of seats, that could blunt some of the built-in Democratic advantages in the upcoming midterms, potentially keeping them "in the game to hold onto their majority." Democrats are screaming about the unfairness of gerrymandering, but they are ruthless gerrymanderers themselves.  Part of the reason the New York Times writes that Democrats have few options on the table to counter potential GOP redistricting plans is that they've already squeezed every ounce of their advantage in some of the bluest states they control: 

Advertisement

But the toolbox for Democrats is relatively sparse, aside from litigation or legislative protests. Though Democratic leaders have indicated a willingness to go tit for tat with Republicans, most of the largest blue states do not have a partisan redistricting process akin to the one in Texas...States where Democrats would have complete control over any redistricting, such as Illinois and Maryland, are already gerrymandered heavily in their favor. Squeezing more Democratic seats out of those states would be a challenge...While Democrats have their share of aggressive gerrymanders, blue states have led in embracing reforms to insulate redistricting from politics, such as creating an independent or bipartisan commission to agree on new maps. Such actions — done in the name of good governance and often with significant support from voters — are now leaving Democrats in a bind.

Democrats have tied their own hands for their own political reasons in some places, while aggressively gerrymandering elsewhere.  They like to pretend that Republicans are the scheming, power-hungry party, and just whistle past glaring examples like these:

Advertisement


As usual, Democrats love gerrymandering and unfair maps as long as those schemes benefit their party.  When the tables are turned, it's "anti-democracy" and "authoritarianism."  Funny how that works.  If President Trump can help the party navigate primary season ahead of the 2026 general, thus avoiding bloody and ugly internecine nominating fights, that could also be rather helpful and a refreshing course correction.  Politico reports that's exactly the plan.  Of course, a massive factor in 2026 will be how the national mood looks around this time next year.  That's unknowable.  As of this moment, though, some of Trump's approval numbers, and overall economic sentiment is heading in the right direction for Republicans:

Advertisement


But there will be many highly-anticipated reports and metrics like these over the next 15 months or so that will be a huge part of the electoral story:

One reality that has to be of concern for Democrats is the part's deep, historic unpopularity.  Elections are a choice, and this is how voters currently feel about one of those choices:

Advertisement


We've also seen a shift in the partisan identification of the broad electorate that took hold in 2024 continuing into 2025:


I'm not sure whether this (or glitchy pre-taped virtual "speeches" from Kamala Harris, for that matter) will help fix matters among the young:


And it doesn't seem as though they're terribly serious about accurately diagnosing what's gone wrong for their party:

Advertisement


I'll leave you with this:

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth, especially ahead of the 2026 midterms!

Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement