CNN's Scott Jennings Drops the Mic on Abrego Garcia, and the Libs Lost...
Battle of Los Angeles: Anti-ICE Leftists Go Berserk Against Federal Agents, Storm DHS...
Elon Musk Seems to Be Retreating Big League After Massive Blow-Up With Trump
Why Canada's Push for Energy Independence Could Take an Ironic Turn
Simone Biles Weighed in on Transgenders in Women's Sports By Attacking Riley Gaines....
Linda McMahon Explains Why Harvard and Columbia are Finally Falling in Line
They Lost Their Son in a Freak Accident—Now They Might Lose Their Freedom...
The Men of D-Day Are Watching Elon and Donald
Infighting is Not Good, But Not Unexpected, Either
Kash Patel's Home Swatted, Says Attack Was Meant to Silence Conservatives and Expose...
Trump Responds to the Return ofAlleged MS-13 Member Abrego Garcia
SNAP Back: Reforming American Health Will Restore Our Economy
Make Pride Sane Again
Ready Or Not, Humanoid Robots Are Here To Stay
Karine Jean-Pierre Book Launch Shows Why Democrats Are Losing Men
Tipsheet

Struck Down: Oklahoma Rejects Pro-Life Bill

Pro-Life advocates suffered a loss in Oklahoma today.

Oklahoma passed Senate Bill 1552 with a 33-12 vote back in May. When it was passed, it was already known that if Bill 1552 became law it would violate federal law. From Politico’s article, when the news originally broke:

Advertisement
<>

"No person shall perform or induce an abortion upon a pregnant woman," the bill's language reads, striking through the clause "unless that person is a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State of Oklahoma."

Supreme Court cases, particularly Roe v. Wade and Casey, established a woman had a fundamental right to abortion. However, the Court has also established, especially in the Carhart cases, that a state does have the right to limit abortion. The state’s interests strengthen in proportion to the pregnancy’s development. This state right also can be exercised in limiting various abortion procedures in order to protect the human dignity of the unborn child, if it also benefits the health of mother.

According to governing.com, the bill would have also strengthened protections for minors. The Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation would need to “create new protocols for statutory rape investigations” and abortion providers would have to “preserve fetal tissue when an abortion is performed on someone under 14 years old” to be used in the investigation. It would also be a felony to give a minor an abortion without parental consent.

Advertisement

Evidentially, the Oklahoma Supreme Court didn’t find that strengthening rape laws and investigations or ensuring that a licensed doctor performs the procedure is in the interest of women’s health.

Instead, they declared that it created an “undue burden,” which is a vaguely defined concept established in Casey that essentially creates a loophole in most abortion restriction laws.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement