Trump: We're Done Subsidizing Europe's Low Drug Prices
UPDATE: He's Out of Gaza; The Last Living American Hostage Held by Hamas...
Don't Believe the Regime Media
There's a Serious Problem With David Hogg's Young People Outreach Strategy
Watch Trump Body Slam This ABC News Reporter When Asked About the Qatar-747...
Dems Have Two Words for Joe Biden Right Now...They're Not Complimentary
The Numbers Are in — and It’s Horrible News for the Gender Mafia
What Gavin Newsom Is Doing to Solve Homelessness Might Surprise You
They Said the DOGE Vote Was Coming. Thomas Massie Explains Why It Didn't.
ATF Has Even More to Answer for After Latest Revelations
Trump Must Bury Biden's Subsidies for Russian and Chinese Minerals
Watch: Dem Senator Doubles Down on Males Invading Female Sports
How America Can Return to Scientific Integrity After Years of Half-Baked Studies Directing...
Chairman Mark Green Demands Answers on Abrego Garcia Traffic Stop
Did You See What Trump Said About Martha Raddatz and the Catholic Vote?
Tipsheet

Cuomo Used Photo From 2006 to Support His Anti-Constitutional Decree Against Religious Gatherings

Democratic National Convention via AP

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo flexed his broad executive power again on Monday, this time telling religious groups that their persistent large gatherings have caused untold numbers of cases of the Wuhan coronavirus throughout the Empire State. 

Advertisement

Outrage ensued because, of course, it did. Cuomo's declaration, limiting all religious services to 10 people or less, even as buses, subways, airplanes, trains, and even NYC restaurants now allow more than 10 people to gather very clearly singled out religious groups. 

But, Cuomo said, it's these religious groups that are causing outbreaks of COVID-19 and they need to stop or he will close them. NYC Mayor de Blasio attempted a similar threat this spring when he literally threatened to close churches "permanently" if they didn't comply with his order. 

What Cuomo and de Blasio don't seem to understand is that the Constitution explicitly forbids executive officers of the government from infringing upon people's right to worship. And even under "states of emergency" that do not seem to have an expiration date, the First Amendment to the Constitution still matters to a whole lot of people. 

Perhaps knowing that this criticism was headed his way, Cuomo and his team came prepared to the Monday press conference with photos of the alleged grievously offensive large gatherings of New York Jews. 

Advertisement

"We know religious institutions have been a problem,” Cuomo said while presenting two photos depicting large gatherings of orthodox Jews. “We know mass gatherings are the super spreader events. We know there have been mass gatherings going on in concert with religious institutions in these communities for weeks. For weeks. I don't mean little violations."

He then specifically pointed to the images as proof for his stunning declaration against members of religious groups in New York.

"These are pictures from the past couple of weeks," he said. "And these are just emblematic. You've all seen pictures like this for weeks. What did you think was going to happen?"

He made it pretty clear after gesturing to the photos, however, that he hadn't done the homework himself. 

"You don't see masks and you see clear violations of social distancing,” Cuomo said, then looking toward his assistant and asking, "when were these pictures from?"

The assistant said to the governor that the photo on the right was "more recent" than the other on the left.

Cuomo went on his diatribe saying that both photos were taken in recent weeks and proved his point that Jewish people in New York needed to be curtailed for their instance on gathering to worship and mourn. 

Advertisement

In fact, the photo on the right was far more recent than Cuomo and his aide implied. It was snapped in 2006 at the funeral for Rabbi Moses Teitelbaum in Kiryas Joel, New York, as reported by the Washington Examiner. 

Even if that photo had been taken the day before Cuomo gave his tyrannical order against religious groups in New York, it wouldn't have been sufficient evidence to curtail people's rights. But the fact that he had to essentially lie to his constituents with false evidence to back up his ruling proves that he knew his order would be received very badly. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement