It’s Hard To Care About Democrats at All Anymore
The Politicization of Motherhood
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 318: What the Bible Says About Blood –...
New Group Aims to Clear Path for Microschools, Church-Based Schools As Choice Movement...
The Radioactive Jew
The Only Real Cure for Political Violence
Here's Why This U.S. Senate Candidate Got Arrested For Threatening Trump
Two American Service Members Go Missing During Military Exercise in Morocco
America Needs the Bible
Counties, Not Capitals: The NPVIC Threat and the Case for a Real Electoral...
Sacred Ground, Secular Safety: Why the Holy Sepulchre Needs a Shelter Now
'Lights, Camera, Smuggle': Fake Movie Biz Used to Traffic Pakistanis Into America
The Onion Is Painfully Unfunny
Man Detained at Trump National Doral Miami Golf Resort
Haidt Drops a Bombshell: Right-Wing Parents Are Raising Happier, Healthier Kids
Tipsheet

Sen. Rick Scott Tears Into NATO: Something 'Is Going to Have to Change'

Sen. Rick Scott Tears Into NATO: Something 'Is Going to Have to Change'
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) tore into the NATO alliance after supposed American allies not only refused to assist the United States in Operation Epic Fury but, in some cases, appeared to actively impede it, denying U.S. forces access to bases and airspace. 

Advertisement

Scott warned that “NATO is going to have to change,” especially if its members expect to continue relying on the United States as the backbone of their military and financial power, and the only nation willing to take decisive action to reshape global security.

"Well, first off, I mean, Europe would all be speaking German if it wasn't for the American service members," Sen. Scott said. "And what we did to save their butts in the Second World War, for them to not support what we're doing in Iran to make them safer and Americans safer is just foolish."

"So NATO is going to have to change. Either they're gonna step up and be a partner and be an ally or why are we even involved in it?" he continued. "It doesn't make any sense that them not supporting what we're doing in Iran, not letting us use military bases. I mean, we built probably most of that stuff and clearly American dollars went into all the defense of Europe over the years. So something's gonna change."

Advertisement

This comes as the actions of several nations have raised questions about whether they still deserve to be considered allies. 

While choosing not to get involved may be defensible, some countries, such as Spain and France, went further, restricting their airspace to U.S. aircraft, signaling they wanted no part in the conflict with Iran, a threat many in Europe acknowledge undermines global stability. Those concerns deepened after Finland’s prime minister told President Trump that NATO is looking to become more Eurocentric.

If that’s the case, then so be it, but say goodbye to any meaningful military alliance. A Eurocentric NATO would likely prove no more effective than the United Nations, as European leaders continue to treat negotiation as the answer to every global crisis. Failure to support the United States will come at a cost, not just in strained alliances, but in diminished security, weakened deterrence, and a far more uncertain future for the West.

Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump and his administration’s bold leadership, we are respected on the world stage, and our enemies are being put on notice.

Help us continue to report on the administration’s peace through strength foreign policy and its successes. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement