Senator Elizabeth Warren, a progressive from Massachusetts, urged Democrats to double down on their progressive agenda on Monday, rejecting the view of many political strategists that the party’s decisive loss in 2024 stemmed from policies perceived by most Americans as too far left.
None of this would be happening if Democrats hadn't been wiped out in 2024. And according to some self-described experts, Democrats lost power because we were too progressive. For a lot of powerful people, wealthy people from Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and Washington, 'too progressive' is code used to undermine any economic agenda that favors working people. Look, they put it more politely, but these movers and shakers want the Democratic Party to respond to the 2024 losses by watering down our economic agenda and sucking up to the rich and powerful. Claiming that a less progressive Democratic Party will win more elections. They are wrong.
Elizabeth Warren says Democrats should ignore voters and double down on their far-Left agenda, even though they were "wiped out in 2024."
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 12, 2026
WARREN: "According to some self-described experts, Democrats lost power because we were too progressive... they are wrong." pic.twitter.com/5Bqtb8z3Zk
Interestingly, in her speech, Warren focused primarily on economic policies labeled “too progressive,” rather than hot-button cultural issues like transgender rights, suggesting that, despite her rhetoric, Democrats may still be recognizing they are losing the battle on that front.
However, economic progressivism remains a significant concern, as its push for extensive government control over markets and wealth redistribution could gradually undermine constitutional freedoms, concentrating power in ways that threaten individual rights and limit economic liberty. In other words, that threatens the foundation of American government and the American way of life.
While Democrats have lost a series of battles over transgender issues and continue to face setbacks in that cultural arena, their brand of progressive economics has gained notable traction in several major American cities. These cities, of course, already lean left, but the electoral success of figures like Zohran Mamdani in New York City was significant enough to draw attention beyond local politics, rallying organizations like the Democratic Socialists of America, and encouraging other socialist candidates to run for office.
Mamdani’s victory underscored a rising appetite for economic policies centered on rent control, public housing, and cost-of-living relief, through the grandiose use of executive authority.
In response, the Trump administration began to recalibrate its economic messaging, focusing more aggressively on affordability. In other words, while conservatives might view Mamdani’s win as an isolated or unsustainable event, it nonetheless prompted a tangible policy shift and even led to a direct meeting between the president and Mamdani.
So, despite victory on the social front, which should have come as little surprise, the economic front remains an area in which conservatives have yet to achieve overwhelming victory.
