This GOP Candidate Is Taking On Tarrant County’s Power Brokers
Chris Cuomo Provides a History of His Failed Journalism, Vogue Swoons As It...
American Society of Plastic Surgeons Opposes 'Gender Affirming' Surgeries for Children
Roger Goodell Punts on Political Halftime Show
Report: TMZ Allegedly Received a Ransom Note for Missing Nancy Guthrie
How You Know Chicago Isn't That Worried About 'Gun Violence'
Gushing Over Gavin
Fellow Democratic Socialist Slams Mayor Mamdani as Storm Blackouts Leave Thousands Without...
Greg Gutfeld Blasts Hollywood and Billie Eilish for Their Hypocrisy and Disconnect From...
Colorado Public School Gives Class to Children on How to Follow and Doxx...
Man Charged for Attacking Federal Officers With a Knife
The Judicial Coup Continues: Judge Blocks ICE From Using Tear Gas on Leftist...
Baltimore Mayor Calls Reporter Racist For Asking Why He Needs $163k Taxpayer-Funded SUV
Major Builders Announce 'Trump Homes' to Solve Affordability Crisis for First-Time Buyers
DOJ Launches Investigation Into California Catholic School Desecrated and Destroyed by Van...
Tipsheet

Scott Jennings Blasts California’s Wealth Tax As Cover-Up for the States $70B Fraud Problem

AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis

Scott Jennings slammed California’s latest budget move: a proposed five percent wealth tax on the state’s wealthiest residents. When he argued the tax was meant to recoup billions lost to fraud, the CNN panel erupted. At the same time, Abby Phillip brushed it off, claiming every state loses money to fraud, as if widespread losses justify ignoring the problem.

Advertisement

"I'm not arguing for it, I'm just saying, it's not a millionaire tax, it's a billionaire tax," Phillip said. "So the idea would be, I guess, to use that revenue to offer improvements for the average Californian."

"Worth debating, why pick a billion?" Jennings replied. "Why in Washington did you pick a million? Why didn't you pick $999,999? Why not pick $500,000? Why pick five percent? Why not six [percent]? Why not 10 [percent], why not 20 [percent], why not 50 [percent]?"

"The thing is, it's all arbitrary just to attack people that we hate. And it is not for the public benefit. In California, the state auditor just found $70 billion in fraud. The reason they need a wealth tax is to cover up the fraud. The hole in California's budget is due to fraud. That's why they're trying to tax..."

Jennings was then interrupted as the liberals on the panel attempted to jump in before their listeners could hear.

Abby Phillip made a curious, almost conceding argument, admitting, “There is fraud in every state in the union, in red states and in blue states.”

Does that excuse the fraud, or the attempt to cover it up?

Advertisement

Jennings even asked if the extra money in the hands of the California government automatically meant the state would wisely and effectively spend it.

Just imagine if the same scrutiny applied to Minnesota were applied to California, whose welfare programs have more loopholes, more bureaucracy, and are far better funded.

The state auditor uncovered $70 billion in fraud; imagine what remains hidden. And that’s still just the tip of the iceberg, not even including the blatant waste of taxpayer money plaguing the state.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code MERRY74 to get 74% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos