Trump Ramps Up Steel Tariffs After Promise in Pittsburgh
This Comedian Pointed out the 'Craziest Narrative' About the 2024 Election
Elon Musk Breaks His Silence on Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' It Was Totally...
Ted Cruz Roasts Senator 'Spartacus' During Fiery Exchange About Threats to Judges
WATCH: Ted Cruz Has Had Enough of These Activist Judges
Networks Shame Themselves Retracting False Gaza Reports, and CNN Fires Reporter Behind Def...
CEO of Health Care Software Company Convicted in $1 Billion Medicare Fraud Scheme
'Lamest Opposition in America': JD Vance Responds to Democrats Trying to Troll Trump...
Male Student 'Switches Gender' During School Day To Watch Girls Change in Locker...
FBI Uncovers Chinese Biopathogen Smuggling Plot at University of Michigan
Californians Eye Kamala Harris 2028 Rumors with Shrugs, Sighs, and Skepticism
Party's Over: Nightclub Full of Illegal Immigrants in South Carolina Raided
WH Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Calls Out BBC for Libelous Claim About IDF...
First Round of DOGE Cuts Headed to Capitol Hill
Scott Jennings Does Not Mince Words When Speaking Out on Terrorist Attacks Against...
Tipsheet

There's an Issue with One Democrat Witness for HR 1 Hearing

AP Photo/Paul Sancya

We've written extensively about HR 1, the Democrats' so called "For the People Act" which conservatives have warned would undermine the election process for years to come. Among its provisions are prohibiting voter identification laws, and mandating taxpayer funding of political campaigns.

Advertisement

A group of Republican attorneys general recently wrote an urgent letter to Congress outlining their concerns.

“As introduced, the Act betrays several Constitutional deficiencies and alarming mandates that, if passed, would federalize state elections and impose burdensome costs and regulations on state and local officials. Under both the Elections Clause of Article I of the Constitution and the Electors Clause of Article II, States have principal—and with presidential elections, exclusive— responsibility to safeguard the manner of holding elections," the Republican AGs wrote. "The Act would invert that constitutional structure, commandeer state resources, confuse and muddle election procedures, and erode faith in our elections and systems of governance.”

Democrats called Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson as a witness for Wednesday's Senate Rules Committee hearing on the legislation. There's one issue, however, as she's not exactly the epitome of voter integrity. Benson tried to issue guidance to Michigan clerks in early October instructing them to presume the accuracy of absentee ballot signatures.

State Court of Claims Judge Christopher Murray ruled the guidance invalid because Benson did not go through the proper rule-making process.

Advertisement

And this is who Democrats want representing them for testimony? 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell issued his own warning on Wednesday. If implemented, he said it would amount to a “federal takeover” of elections.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement