DHS Secretary Noem's Latest Announcement for Minneapolis Operations Will Likely Anger Libs
State Department Faces Lawsuit Over Visa Ban
Arrest of Don Lemon Had the Sunday Shows Acting Acidic, 'Melania' Panned by...
Orange Man Bad, Ayatollah Good?
Violent Anti-ICE Extremism Is on Display at Penn State
Kathy Hochul Vows to Impede ICE Operations in New York
When Authority Gets Audited: Epstein, Enforcement, and Institutional Trust
Democrats Have Bastardized What it Means to Protest
NC Senate Candidate Once Declared His Final Month as Gov. 'International Migrant Month'
Sen. Kennedy Blasts Tim Walz As a Less Masculine Hillary Clinton, Calls for...
Canada Played Dirty to Keep This American Out of the Olympics. Was It...
Bill and Hillary Clinton Reverse Course and Will Testify in Front of Congress
CNN Disgustingly Glorifies Teenage 'ICE Watchers' in New Story
Here's How Democrats Are Making Their Cities Even More Dangerous
New Poll Shows Democrats Are in for a Rude Awakening on Immigration
Tipsheet
Premium

GOP Congresswoman on How Dems' Violence Against Women Act 'Does Not Support Women'

House Television via AP

Don't let the name fool you. The Democrats' Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act is an empty promise, warns Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ). In a recent conversation with her friend and colleague Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ), she highlighted a few of the more dangerous aspects of the legislation. Rep. Lesko is a domestic violence survivor herself and has been very candid about how she escaped an abusive ex-husband. As such, she knows better than most in Congress as to how to protect women in similar situations. And the Democrats' changes to VAWA, she says, is not the right course.

"This is a radical bill that the Democrats are pushing through because it really violates women's privacy and safety," Lesko explains. "Basically, under penalty of federal law, requires women's domestic violence shelters to take in men and place them right next to women."

She continues to explain that the bill also takes away religious organizations' First Amendment rights by forcing its provisions upon them. And, she adds, the bill takes away Second Amendment rights by going after suspects who don't even have felony convictions. 

"They just want to take away their guns without any due process," she notes.

Lesko expanded on these points in a recent op-ed for Fox News, explaining how the Violence Against Women Act, while initially bipartisan, "has become a political vehicle for radical Democrat policies." President Biden was "ironically" one of the bill's original sponsors.

"Ironically, President Biden, the bill’s original sponsor in the U.S. Senate – along with retired Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah – will be signing a version of the bill so perverted by partisanship, it will hardly be recognizable to its original drafter," Lesko regrets. "If the House version prevails, Democrats and Biden will be making it clear that putting leftist gender ideology into federal law is a far greater priority than helping women in need."

With the Democrats in control of both the House and Senate, however, the bill has a much stronger chance of passing.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement