House Republicans Promise to Keep Pushing Measures to Make DC Great Again
Trump Waited in the Tall Grass for This Moment on Gun Rights. It's...
The Timing When ICE Will Ramp Up Deportation Operations in Chicago Is Perfect
Canadian Police Chief's Advice on Dealing With Home Invasions Is Beyond Offensive
Censure Rep. Rashida Tlaib for Fanning the Flames of Terrorism and Antisemitism
The Crusade Against THC in Texas Has Gone Up in Smoke
Trump Drops Hint About His Next Crime-Ridden Target City—and Democrats Are Losing It
CBS News Staff Rages About a Bari Weiss Takeover
Andy Barr’s DEI Double Standard
Gazan Boy Alive and Well Following Multiple Reports He Was Killed by IDF...
Judge Rules Cuts to Harvard Funding Is Unconstitutional
Cassidy Is Sinking: Louisiana Risks Becoming the Next Nebraska
Giuliani Suffers Broken Back From Car Crash
8 Michigan Men Charged in International Car Smuggling Ring
Michigan Man Pleads Guilty to Voter Fraud
Tipsheet

Sen. Tim Kaine Offers a Weak Reason for Opposing Virtual Amy Coney Barrett Hearings

Toni L. Sandys/The Washington Post via AP

Democrats are grabbing any excuse they can to delay the confirmation hearings for President Trump's Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. The president's positive COVID diagnosis, for one. The number of senators getting the virus, for another. But there's a solution to those safety concerns: virtual hearings. A number of committees have already, successfully conducted business via Zoom, so why can't the Senate Judiciary do the same and question Barrett the same way?

Advertisement

The RNC picked out a handful of hypocritical senators on Monday who praised the use of "hybrid hearings" before it came to Barrett's nomination. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), for instance, thanked Chairman Lindsey Graham for holding the virtual hearing for Judge Justin Walker's nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. 

"Thank you for being willing to do a hybrid hearing like we're seeing today...I'm glad that we are seeing senators there as well as remotely," she said at the time.

On Monday Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) said that the rise in coronavirus cases in the Senate should mark an end to the hearings.

"Sadly three of my colleagues have been diagnosed as having the virus, he noted, before making a poor analogy. "Now, if this were a baseball team or a football team and three of the players came down with COVID-19, we would have cancelled the game and postponed it to a future date."

And yet in March, Durbin said there was no reason why they can't do their jobs remotely.

"Why is it imperative to be physically present on the floor closer to one another than perhaps we should be," he asked.

Advertisement

See below for more proof that work can go on interrupted.

But Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) alleges that he and his colleagues can't possibly proceed with the Barrett hearings. Because, as he explained to an MSNBC host, he won't have the luxury of aides whispering notes in his ear, making him "less able in his questioning."

I'm sure Sen. Kaine's concerns will be taken into consideration...but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has already indicated that he plans to stay on schedule with Barrett's nomination.

"The Senate Judiciary Committee will convene on October 12th as Chairman Graham has scheduled to begin confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination to the Supreme Court," McConnell announced. "The Senate’s floor schedule will not interrupt the thorough, fair, and historically supported confirmation process previously laid out by Chairman Graham."

Advertisement

"Since May," he adds, "the Judiciary Committee has operated flawlessly through a hybrid method that has seen some Senators appear physically at its hearings while other members have participated virtually. The Committee has utilized this format successfully for many months while protecting the health and safety of all involved."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement