The Death of Cross-Examination
CNN Guest Has Found This Narrative to Be Supremely Boring...and That Was Just...
Here's Another Lib Female Meltdown...and It's a Doozy
Bloomberg Reporter Caught Giving Marco Rubio the Finger During Presser With Hungarian PM
You Won't Believe What the Iranian Regime Did to Citizens Attending a 16-Year-Old...
D.C. Water Manager Gadis Once Praised City's Diverse Executives. How's That Working Out...
Thomas Massie, Who Loves to Talk About His 'Principles,' Just Made Quite the...
Schrödinger's Trans Women
Check Out How Nashville Jacked Up Property Taxes for One Local Business
This North Carolina Republican Believes His Home Was Targeted in a Drive-By Shooting
Olympian Who Bashed Trump Over LGBTQ Rights Is Out of Medal Contention
Mamdani's Solution to City's Budget Shortfall Is Exactly What You'd Expect
Anti-ICE Groups Have Found a New Way to 'Resist' Federal Immigration Laws
JD Vance Mocks AOC’s Munich Meltdown: 'The Most Uncomfortable 20 Seconds of Television...
Kevin O'Leary Blasts CNN Panel Over Mamdani’s Tax Hike: 'You're All Nuts'
Tipsheet

Jim Jordan Upends Democrats' 'Fear Mongering' Over the Census in Fiery New Report

Jim Jordan Upends Democrats' 'Fear Mongering' Over the Census in Fiery New Report
AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-MD) warned Attorney General William Barr in a letter Thursday that if DOJ official John Gore doesn't obey his subpoena and testify before the panel, they are prepared to hold him in contempt of Congress. The DOJ had previously informed Cummings that Gore will not appear unless he's allowed to have an agency lawyer by his side.

Advertisement

“The Committee expects Mr. Gore to testify in accordance with the Committee's lawful subpoena and the Committee's rules,” Cummings wrote. “If Mr. Gore fails to comply with the subpoena, the Committee will consider him to be in contempt of Congress.”

Cummings indicated that the committee wants to glean information from Gore about the citizenship question that was added to the 2020 census under the direction of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross. 

The House Oversight Committee grilled Ross last month about the change, which he defended. Democrats like Rep. Jackie Speier (CA) asserted that Ross's voting rights justification "was just a cynical pretext to trample on the rights of immigrants." California was among the coalition of 17 states that sued the Commerce Department over the census change.

Conservative lawmakers, as you can imagine, have a whole different perspective. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) came out with a report today accusing Democrats of "fear mongering" and added that the campaign Cummings is leading against the citizenship question is a "partisan investigation."

"The Democrat fear-mongering about the citizenship question on the 2020 Census is disingenuous and wrong," Jordan writes. "Soliciting citizenship information from the people present in the United States is not new and should not be controversial."

Advertisement

Related:

CITIZENSHIP DOJ

He corroborated that claim by then citing history. 

"Every decennial census from 1820 to 1950 inquired about citizenship," he writes. "From 1970 to 2000, the long-form census—sent to a segment of the population—inquired about citizenship. Since 2005, the Census Bureau has asked 3.5 million Americans about their citizenship every year."

Jordan could only guess that Democrats "do not want to know how many citizens there are in the United States."

You can read the whole letter here.

The Supreme Court will soon consider whether the citizenship question violates the Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos