Here's What a Shark Tank Host Said About Kamala That Caused a Total...
Mel Gibson Says It's Not Shocking Who He's Voting for Since Kamala Has...
House Speaker Mike Johnson: 'Fed Up Americans' Ready to Blame Kamala Harris on...
'Desperate': Top Dems Demand Special Counsel Investigate Jared Kushner
General Milley’s Attack on the Constitution
Here’s the Highlights of Joe Rogan’s Three-Hour Interview With Trump
Israel Offers Grim Warning to Iran After Launching Strikes
Here's When We'll Likely Know the Election Results From These Key Swing States
New Bombshell Report Reveals Biden,Harris Granted Amnesty to Millions of Illegal Aliens
Why This Crazy Leftist Wants Elon Musk Arrested
Susan Rice Was Not Happy When WaPo Refused to Endorse Kamala
Unbelievable: Two ‘Bearded Guys’ Competed in a Women’s Soccer Match
The Liberal Media Is Not Happy About This
Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Kills Texas Man Under Biden, Harris Admin
The Reason Why an Actress Found a Fan Edit 'Offensive' Will Make You...
Tipsheet

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Wednesday marked the 64-year anniversary of the historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling. The unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court decision declared that the "separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional and started the process of ending school segregation.

Advertisement

With the landmark decision's milestone, groups like Legal Defense Fund are demanding two Trump-nominated judicial nominees withdraw their names from consideration. The nominees, Wendy Vitter, nominated for a federal judgeship in New Orleans, and Andrew Oldham, nominated for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, "refused" to answer in their confirmation hearings whether Brown v. BOE was correctly decided.

Brown v. BOE "corrected an egregious error" in overruling Plessy v. Ferguson, Oldham said when asked by Sen. Richard Blumenthal in his confirmation hearing, but did not expand.

Wendy Vitter also did not provide an answer, telling Blumenthal during her own hearing that she "will respectfully not comment." She did, however, offer the following.

“It’s very easy to see Plessy v. Ferguson and to read Justice Harlan’s dissent which of course became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education and to look at that and say well that sounds very obvious to us now in 2018, that that was the right decision, but that’s hindsight, I have the benefit of that hindsight.”

Advertisement

Still, "this is disqualifying, and her nomination must be withdrawn," the Defense Fund charges.

Some Democratic lawmakers agree. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) called it "disturbing."

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Vitter's nomination Thursday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement