DHS Secretary Noem's Latest Announcement for Minneapolis Operations Will Likely Anger Libs
State Department Faces Lawsuit Over Visa Ban
Arrest of Don Lemon Had the Sunday Shows Acting Acidic, 'Melania' Panned by...
Orange Man Bad, Ayatollah Good?
Violent Anti-ICE Extremism Is on Display at Penn State
Kathy Hochul Vows to Impede ICE Operations in New York
When Authority Gets Audited: Epstein, Enforcement, and Institutional Trust
Democrats Have Bastardized What it Means to Protest
NC Senate Candidate Once Declared His Final Month as Gov. 'International Migrant Month'
Sen. Kennedy Blasts Tim Walz As a Less Masculine Hillary Clinton, Calls for...
Canada Played Dirty to Keep This American Out of the Olympics. Was It...
Bill and Hillary Clinton Reverse Course and Will Testify in Front of Congress
CNN Disgustingly Glorifies Teenage 'ICE Watchers' in New Story
Here's How Democrats Are Making Their Cities Even More Dangerous
New Poll Shows Democrats Are in for a Rude Awakening on Immigration
Tipsheet

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Wednesday marked the 64-year anniversary of the historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling. The unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court decision declared that the "separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional and started the process of ending school segregation.

Advertisement

With the landmark decision's milestone, groups like Legal Defense Fund are demanding two Trump-nominated judicial nominees withdraw their names from consideration. The nominees, Wendy Vitter, nominated for a federal judgeship in New Orleans, and Andrew Oldham, nominated for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, "refused" to answer in their confirmation hearings whether Brown v. BOE was correctly decided.

Brown v. BOE "corrected an egregious error" in overruling Plessy v. Ferguson, Oldham said when asked by Sen. Richard Blumenthal in his confirmation hearing, but did not expand.

Wendy Vitter also did not provide an answer, telling Blumenthal during her own hearing that she "will respectfully not comment." She did, however, offer the following.

“It’s very easy to see Plessy v. Ferguson and to read Justice Harlan’s dissent which of course became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education and to look at that and say well that sounds very obvious to us now in 2018, that that was the right decision, but that’s hindsight, I have the benefit of that hindsight.”

Advertisement

Related:

RACE SEGREGATION

Still, "this is disqualifying, and her nomination must be withdrawn," the Defense Fund charges.

Some Democratic lawmakers agree. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) called it "disturbing."

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Vitter's nomination Thursday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement