The Dems' Likely Counterpoint on Russian Collusion Hoax Isn't Going to Hold Up...
Read Our Lips - No Amnesty Ever
Democrats Go All-In On Stupid
More Satisfying Than Being Number One
Lou Dobbs is Smiling in Heaven as Trump-Era Broadcasting Overhaul Paralyzes Liberals
It's Time for Late Night to Call it a Night (Colbert the...
Jihad Joe
Goodnight and Good Riddance to the Late Show
New Groundbreaking MAGA Movie, Not Just Another Documentary, is Reaching Gen Z
Trump Drops Explosive 'No One Is Above the Law' Video — Ends with...
Gabbard Drops Bombshell, Claims Obama-Era Coup Targeted Trump
$1,300 Target Theft by Indian Visitor Sparks Visa Revocation Warning
Capitol Hill Intern Killed Near White House: Family Demands Action As DC Crime...
The Real Reason In-N-Out’s Heiress Is Leaving California
Klobuchar’s Deflection Fails: Trump Exposes Dems’ Silence on Epstein Files While She Spins...
Tipsheet

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Wednesday marked the 64-year anniversary of the historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling. The unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court decision declared that the "separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional and started the process of ending school segregation.

Advertisement

With the landmark decision's milestone, groups like Legal Defense Fund are demanding two Trump-nominated judicial nominees withdraw their names from consideration. The nominees, Wendy Vitter, nominated for a federal judgeship in New Orleans, and Andrew Oldham, nominated for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, "refused" to answer in their confirmation hearings whether Brown v. BOE was correctly decided.

Brown v. BOE "corrected an egregious error" in overruling Plessy v. Ferguson, Oldham said when asked by Sen. Richard Blumenthal in his confirmation hearing, but did not expand.

Wendy Vitter also did not provide an answer, telling Blumenthal during her own hearing that she "will respectfully not comment." She did, however, offer the following.

“It’s very easy to see Plessy v. Ferguson and to read Justice Harlan’s dissent which of course became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education and to look at that and say well that sounds very obvious to us now in 2018, that that was the right decision, but that’s hindsight, I have the benefit of that hindsight.”

Advertisement

Still, "this is disqualifying, and her nomination must be withdrawn," the Defense Fund charges.

Some Democratic lawmakers agree. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) called it "disturbing."

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Vitter's nomination Thursday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement