Does Obama Have Presidential Immunity for Russiagate?
CNN's Top Legal Analyst Just Blew Apart the Dems' Anti-Trump Narrative on Federalizing...
The Dems' 'Crime in DC Is Down' Narrative Just Got Taken to the...
The Daily Beast Just Got a Brutal Fact-Check...and It's Absolutely Insane
The Democrats’ Mortifying Public Impotence
A City-Run Grocery Store in Missouri Closed. Want to Guess the Reason?
Time To Stop F-ing Around at the FDA
UK Group Thinks They've Really Stuck It to JD Vance With Van Stunt
End Biden’s Big Labor Giveaway Before the Rail Merger Rolls
With a Side Order of Truth
Trump Sees Himself as DC's Top Lawman
Making American Children Healthy Again
How Trump Is Beating China at Its Own Game
Tulsi Gabbard Declassifies Bombshell Email Proving Russia Hoax Was Manufactured
DOJ Smashes Transnational Elder Fraud Ring That Stole Over $5M from 400 Seniors
Tipsheet

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Wednesday marked the 64-year anniversary of the historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling. The unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court decision declared that the "separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional and started the process of ending school segregation.

Advertisement

With the landmark decision's milestone, groups like Legal Defense Fund are demanding two Trump-nominated judicial nominees withdraw their names from consideration. The nominees, Wendy Vitter, nominated for a federal judgeship in New Orleans, and Andrew Oldham, nominated for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, "refused" to answer in their confirmation hearings whether Brown v. BOE was correctly decided.

Brown v. BOE "corrected an egregious error" in overruling Plessy v. Ferguson, Oldham said when asked by Sen. Richard Blumenthal in his confirmation hearing, but did not expand.

Wendy Vitter also did not provide an answer, telling Blumenthal during her own hearing that she "will respectfully not comment." She did, however, offer the following.

“It’s very easy to see Plessy v. Ferguson and to read Justice Harlan’s dissent which of course became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education and to look at that and say well that sounds very obvious to us now in 2018, that that was the right decision, but that’s hindsight, I have the benefit of that hindsight.”

Advertisement

Still, "this is disqualifying, and her nomination must be withdrawn," the Defense Fund charges.

Some Democratic lawmakers agree. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) called it "disturbing."

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Vitter's nomination Thursday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement