Townhall Media Is Hiring!
Don't Believe the Regime Media
There's a Serious Problem With David Hogg's Young People Outreach Strategy
Watch Trump Body Slam This ABC News Reporter When Asked About the Qatar-747...
The Numbers Are in — and It’s Horrible News for the Gender Mafia
Former Buffalo DA Claims Schools Cooperative, but Is He Trustworthy on This?
Homan Says Newark Mayor Arrested for ‘Storming’ ICE Facility ‘Not Very Smart’
DHS Launches Investigation Into California Over Providing Benefits to Illegal Aliens
Newly Released Hostage Sends a Special Message to President Trump
Trump Slams Big Pharma Over $1,300 'Fat Shot': Says Americans Are Getting Ripped...
These Democrats Have Quite the Take on Trade Deal With China
Illegal Alien Criminals and Child Predators Next in Crackdown, FBI Deputy Director Bongino...
Trump Must Bury Biden's Subsidies for Russian and Chinese Minerals
Watch: Dem Senator Doubles Down on Males Invading Female Sports
How America Can Return to Scientific Integrity After Years of Half-Baked Studies Directing...
Tipsheet

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Wednesday marked the 64-year anniversary of the historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling. The unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court decision declared that the "separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional and started the process of ending school segregation.

Advertisement

With the landmark decision's milestone, groups like Legal Defense Fund are demanding two Trump-nominated judicial nominees withdraw their names from consideration. The nominees, Wendy Vitter, nominated for a federal judgeship in New Orleans, and Andrew Oldham, nominated for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, "refused" to answer in their confirmation hearings whether Brown v. BOE was correctly decided.

Brown v. BOE "corrected an egregious error" in overruling Plessy v. Ferguson, Oldham said when asked by Sen. Richard Blumenthal in his confirmation hearing, but did not expand.

Wendy Vitter also did not provide an answer, telling Blumenthal during her own hearing that she "will respectfully not comment." She did, however, offer the following.

“It’s very easy to see Plessy v. Ferguson and to read Justice Harlan’s dissent which of course became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education and to look at that and say well that sounds very obvious to us now in 2018, that that was the right decision, but that’s hindsight, I have the benefit of that hindsight.”

Advertisement

Still, "this is disqualifying, and her nomination must be withdrawn," the Defense Fund charges.

Some Democratic lawmakers agree. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) called it "disturbing."

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Vitter's nomination Thursday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement