The Decline of Rock Parallels the Decline of America
CNN's Van Jones Had the Perfect Line to Describe the NY Socialist Takeover...
Minimum Wage Fail
Dysphoria and Dysfunction Are Displayed, From Reflecting Pool Algae Distemper to Disturbin...
If Citizens Lose Faith in Elections, Accountability Dies
World Cracking Down on Immigration Abuse, a Decade After 'Fact-Checks' Called Trump Claim...
Leadership 101
One Small Step for School Choice
RFK Is the Furthest Thing From 'Checked Out’
The Vanishing Conservative Supreme Court
A Green Card Isn't a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card
When Did Citizenship Become Optional at the Ballot Box?
Paris Betrays Its Own Ideals
El-Sayed’s Plan to Raise Prescription Drug Prices
NCAA Announces Major Rules Changes to Student-Athlete Eligibility
Tipsheet

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Wednesday marked the 64-year anniversary of the historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling. The unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court decision declared that the "separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional and started the process of ending school segregation.

Advertisement

With the landmark decision's milestone, groups like Legal Defense Fund are demanding two Trump-nominated judicial nominees withdraw their names from consideration. The nominees, Wendy Vitter, nominated for a federal judgeship in New Orleans, and Andrew Oldham, nominated for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, "refused" to answer in their confirmation hearings whether Brown v. BOE was correctly decided.

Brown v. BOE "corrected an egregious error" in overruling Plessy v. Ferguson, Oldham said when asked by Sen. Richard Blumenthal in his confirmation hearing, but did not expand.

Wendy Vitter also did not provide an answer, telling Blumenthal during her own hearing that she "will respectfully not comment." She did, however, offer the following.

“It’s very easy to see Plessy v. Ferguson and to read Justice Harlan’s dissent which of course became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education and to look at that and say well that sounds very obvious to us now in 2018, that that was the right decision, but that’s hindsight, I have the benefit of that hindsight.”

Advertisement

Related:

RACE SEGREGATION

Still, "this is disqualifying, and her nomination must be withdrawn," the Defense Fund charges.

Some Democratic lawmakers agree. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) called it "disturbing."

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Vitter's nomination Thursday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement