Chaos Breaks Out In This City After Anti-ICE Protesters Clash With Police
Marjorie Taylor Greene Wants to Lay Waste to This Fraud-Ridden Immigration Program
Is the Biden-Obama Bromance Over?
Everybody Hates Chuck
Meet the Hammerbande, One of the Groups the US Classified As an International...
Graham Platner's Campaign Failed to File His Personal Financial Disclosures
Gavin Newsom Blames Climate Change for Slow Rebuild of Pacific Palisades
Do No Harm, American Alliance for Equal Rights File Suit Over MI Law...
Rep. Jim Jordan Launches Congressional Probe of VA Prosecutor Stymying Stephen Miller Inve...
Former UK Speaker of the House John Bercow Joins Free Iran Convention As...
Seattle's Mayor-Elect Vows a Progressive Tax Agenda and Collectivism
Gun Rights Groups File Brief in Challenge of Vermont's Waiting Period for Gun...
US Agriculture Secretary Announces SNAP Overhaul
Democrats Created the SNAP Crisis, Yet Senator Booker Is Blaming Republicans
The Trump Administration Cracks Down on H-1B Visa Fraud
Tipsheet

Massachusetts to Tax Uber to Subsidize Taxis

Well this is absurd: Massachusetts is planning on taxing ride-sharing services like Uber in order to bail out...the taxi industry. This is the first tax of this kind in the country. Taxis are upset that ride-sharing services don't follow the same rules as the taxi industry (which makes sense, given that...they're not taxis.)

Advertisement

From Reuters:

Massachusetts is preparing to levy a 5-cent fee per trip on ride-hailing apps such as Uber and Lyft and spend the money on the traditional taxi industry, a subsidy that appears to be the first of its kind in the United States.

Republican Governor Charlie Baker signed the nickel fee into law this month as part of a sweeping package of regulations for the industry.

[...]

The law levies a 20-cent fee in all, with 5 cents for taxis, 10 cents going to cities and towns and the final 5 cents designated for a state transportation fund.

The fee may raise millions of dollars a year because Lyft and Uber alone have a combined 2.5 million rides per month in Massachusetts.

The law says the money will help taxi businesses to adopt "new technologies and advanced service, safety and operational capabilities" and to support workforce development.

This is absurd. Given that the cars used by ride-sharing drivers are either owned or leased by said drivers, they do have to go through the same regulations as taxis and pass state inspections. In Massachusetts, vehicles are inspected yearly--it's not legal to drive a car without an inspection sticker. Uber should not be punished for figuring out how to connect drivers and riders via a mobile phone app before the traditional taxi industry did--and that's effectively what this tax seeks to do.

Advertisement

Related:

MASSACHUSETTS UBER

This tax is the equivalent of charging extra for lightbulbs in order to bail out the candlestick makers. Technology adapts and moves on, and it's not the government's role to prop up outdated industries. Taxis should take steps on their own to keep up with a competing industry.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement