Here's What Shocked a Former MSNBC Analyst About Erika Kirk's Heartbreaking Address
The ‘Progressive’ Left – The ‘Democratic’ Party – Has Shown You Exactly Who...
Spanberger Faces Questions As Chesterfield School Board Member Urged to Resign Over Charli...
Trustee Resigns As Oxford Union Faces Backlash After President-Elect Celebrates Charlie Ki...
South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson Introduces Bill to Re-Impose Jackson-Vanik Sanctions on Rus...
I Am a Yankee Doodle Dandy
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 285: Archaeology Proves King David a Historical Figure...
UN General Assembly Could Mark a Turning Point on Iran
Feds Probe Left-Wing Groups for Possible Ties to Charlie Kirk Killing as One...
Charlie Kirk’s Assassination and the Rising Tide of Left-Wing Political Violence
The Voice of a Mother
How Trump’s Tariffs Helped Thwart a War in Southeast Asia
Charlie Kirk Killed By Extremist—David Hogg Makes It About Himself
DOJ Declares School Dissent Protected Under First Amendment
'We Are Charlie Kirk!' South Koreans Take to the Streets in Global Show...
Tipsheet

Massachusetts to Tax Uber to Subsidize Taxis

Well this is absurd: Massachusetts is planning on taxing ride-sharing services like Uber in order to bail out...the taxi industry. This is the first tax of this kind in the country. Taxis are upset that ride-sharing services don't follow the same rules as the taxi industry (which makes sense, given that...they're not taxis.)

Advertisement

From Reuters:

Massachusetts is preparing to levy a 5-cent fee per trip on ride-hailing apps such as Uber and Lyft and spend the money on the traditional taxi industry, a subsidy that appears to be the first of its kind in the United States.

Republican Governor Charlie Baker signed the nickel fee into law this month as part of a sweeping package of regulations for the industry.

[...]

The law levies a 20-cent fee in all, with 5 cents for taxis, 10 cents going to cities and towns and the final 5 cents designated for a state transportation fund.

The fee may raise millions of dollars a year because Lyft and Uber alone have a combined 2.5 million rides per month in Massachusetts.

The law says the money will help taxi businesses to adopt "new technologies and advanced service, safety and operational capabilities" and to support workforce development.

This is absurd. Given that the cars used by ride-sharing drivers are either owned or leased by said drivers, they do have to go through the same regulations as taxis and pass state inspections. In Massachusetts, vehicles are inspected yearly--it's not legal to drive a car without an inspection sticker. Uber should not be punished for figuring out how to connect drivers and riders via a mobile phone app before the traditional taxi industry did--and that's effectively what this tax seeks to do.

Advertisement

This tax is the equivalent of charging extra for lightbulbs in order to bail out the candlestick makers. Technology adapts and moves on, and it's not the government's role to prop up outdated industries. Taxis should take steps on their own to keep up with a competing industry.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos