From Death Row: ‘Thank You’ From Christian Brothers Facing Execution for Their Faith
Trump Administration Launches Civil Rights Investigation Into New York City's Department o...
U.S. Court of Appeals Just Dealt Trump Administration a Blow on Asylum Claims
On WHCA Weekend, Substack Celebrates ‘Independent Journalism’ by Trotting Out Castoff Corp...
The NY Times Tries and Fails to Gin Up Sympathy for Laid Off...
The Official Democrat X Account Tried Deleting Its Tweet Attacking Hung Cao...but There...
J.K. Rowling Offers Support After Trans Assault in Scottish Women’s Prison Sparks Backlash
Democrats Can't Distance Themselves From Hasan Piker Now
A North Carolina School Superintendent Sees Nothing Wrong With This LGTBQ Book for...
It Sure Sounds Like Hakeem Jeffries Just Tried to Threaten the VA Supreme...
Rich NY Writer Who Called Stealing a 'Political Protest' Melts Down When Confronted...
Iran Activates Retired 30-Year-Old Super Tanker As They Run Out of Places to...
Leading CA Gov Candidate Says US Should've Been More Aggressive on Asylum, Blames...
This GOP Rep Is Calling for the Pardon of the Special Forces Soldier...
Pete Hegseth Warns Our Allies That the Time for Free-Riding Is Over
Tipsheet

Spanish High Court Rules Pandemic Lockdown Unconstitutional

Spanish High Court Rules Pandemic Lockdown Unconstitutional
AP Photo/Paul White

The first Wuhan coronavirus lockdown imposed by the government of Spain was ruled unconstitutional by the Spanish Constitutional Court, in a 6-5 ruling on Wednesday.

Advertisement

The ruling, which came in response to a suit brought by the right-wing Vox Party, found that the lockdown’s “limitations on movement” had violated the fundamental liberties of Spanish citizens. Therefore, the court said, the “state of alarm” order issued by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez was insufficient and not protected by Spain’s national constitution.

Attorneys for the Vox Party had argued that any enforcement of Sánchez’s restrictions would have required a “state of exception” order, which is essentially a more expansive state of alarm that requires parliamentary approval instead of just the prime minister’s cabinet.

In a statement, the Court said that the ruling “annulled by a simple majority some articles of the state of emergency decree related to free movement of citizens.” Its complete ruling has not yet been publicized but will likely be released in the coming days.

Sánchez issued his state of alarm order on March 14, 2020, as Wuhan coronavirus cases spiked across Spain. Under the order, which was just the second of its kind since Spain transitioned to democratic rule in 1978, most citizens were only permitted to leave their homes for essential shopping or medical trips.

Advertisement

Related:

COVID-19 LOCKDOWN

After 98 days of one of Europe’s strictest lockdowns, Sánchez’s order was lifted on June 20, 2020, paving the way for Spain to transition to an era of “new normal” with relaxed restrictions. But as cases continue to spike among young Spaniards, local governments are pushing for a return to many of the restrictions.

In the region of Valencia on Monday, a court authorized the return of a 10-person limit on gatherings, as well as a 1 a.m. curfew in 32 “high-risk” towns that had recorded significant outbreaks. And also on Monday, officials in the region of Catalonia enacted a 12:30 A.M. curfew, capacity restrictions for nightclubs, and a ban on eating and drinking in the streets.

The ruling of Spain’s highest court is likely to provide a legal pedestal for anti-restriction cases in the near future. Roughly 51 percent of the country is fully vaccinated, and vaccination rates are both steadily increasing and, ironically, generally greater in the urban areas that have enacted the new restrictions.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement