Inside Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’
Trump Issues an Update on the Fate of TikTok
Judges Orders Trump Administration to Return Deported MS-13 Member
Look How the Associated Press Reacted to the March Jobs Report
FBI Caught Spying on Lawful Gun Owners—You Won’t Believe Why
These Senators Just Introduced a Bill to Rein in Trump's Tariffs
First Quarter Ratings Sees Fox Beating the Networks, As CBS Takes a Saber...
While Many States Try to Curtail Gun Ownership, Montana Is Trying Something Different
Beijing’s Silent Takeover: How the CCP Bought America’s Leaders, Media, and Institutions
Doug Emhoff's Law Firm Bends the Knee to Trump Admin In Shocking Move
Trump Demands Freedom for Le Pen: Calls Conviction a Political Witch Hunt
Supreme Court Sides With Trump Admin Against Teacher Grants Over DEI Concerns
IDF Kills Terrorist Who Likely Played a Key Role in Kidnapping, Killing Kfir...
Here's Why Bernie Sanders' Anti-Israel Resolutions Are That Much Worse This Time
Here’s What NY Democrats Say About a Hypothetical Schumer-AOC Primary
Tipsheet

A Way to Get Hobby Lobby to 6-3?

Just to start with a caveat: Only a fool would predict with any certainty the way the Supreme Court is going to rule in the Hobby Lobby case.

Advertisement

But.

Based on some of the questions and general knowledge about some of the justices, it seems quite likely to me that Chief Justice Roberts will author a relatively narrow opinion, upholding Hobby Lobby's religious liberty rights -- based on its status as a privately held corporation.

Just based on common sense (and some of the objections raised by Justice Kagan and others), such a holding would eliminate the administrability problems that crop up with a publicly-held corporation -- whose religious beliefs are being counted? Shareholders'? the board's? what if they conflict? -- simply don't exist when a private corporation has an owner, like the Greens (whose religious beliefs are well-known and longstanding).

But there are other reasons that the Chief Justice might take this approach.

As we learned in the heartbreaking aftermath of the previous ObamaCare case, the Chief Justice takes very seriously his responsibilities to the perceived legitimacy of the Supreme Court. He might believe that a narrow ruling, declining to issue a grand, sweeping opinion to apply to corporations across the board, would reduce some of the furor.

Second of all, a narrow opinion has a better chance of attracting the support of both Justice Kennedy and Justice Breyer. One of them is needed to create a 5-4 majority, but with two there would be a solid, more seemingly "legitimate" 6-3 opinion.

Even at that, however, keep in mind that neither Justice Kennedy's nor Justice Breyer's support is assured. Justice Kennedy has a well-known reputation for caring greatly about elite opinion, and elite opinion has no cow more sacred than abortion. He may have been strongly in favor of striking down the Affordable Care Act as a whole, but in that case, "respectable" Commerce Clause questions were at stake, not visceral social issues. I suspect he's not going to be chomping at the bit to sign on to a sweeping opinion. Maybe a narrower one, applying to fewer cases, could entice him aboard.

Advertisement

Then there is Justice Breyer. He is a liberal, he affirmed the constitutionality of ObamaCare, and presumably supports abortion rights both as a matter of politics and as a constitutional matter. But he is also Jewish, and Jewish people -- from bitter historical experience across the world -- know well the pain of being penalized by one's government just for holding a minority religious belief. Therein lies the conflict that may well shape his thinking . . . and which may make a narrow opinion very appealing to him, as well.

So we'll see. In any case, if the Chief Justice does push this narrow approach through to a majority, we may be able to expect to see some brilliant concurrences -- with more sweeping language -- from Justices Thomas, Scalia and Alito.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement