What Hunter Biden Said About Illegal Immigration Is Rather Trumpian
Here's Bari Weiss' Memo on the CECOT Story. Notice Anything Wrong?
Dems, You Think an Initiative With *That* Title Will Help You Win Back...
Why a Philadelphia Flyers Announcer Got Suspended
Mitt Romney's New Take on Taxes Is What You'd Expect
DC's Gun Ban Might Be on Borrowed Time Because of This Lawsuit
When Your Last Name Is Biden, Being Out of Touch Is Par for...
Zohran Mamdani Chalks Up His Antisemitic Staff Problem As a 'Wide Variety of...
Why Is Wisconsin AG Josh Kaul Refusing to Turn State Voter Data Over...
Here's Why a British Retailer Pulled This 'Offensive' Christmas Card
Greta Thunberg Arrested Again, This Time Under the UK's Terrorism Act
The Q3 US GDP Number Has Dropped...and the Media Are Calling It 'Unexpected'
NPR Puts the Kibosh on This Oft-Quoted Professor and 'Expert'
Nearly 100 Minnesota Mayors Blast Tim Walz For 'Fraud, Unchecked Spending'
This University Just Canned a Trans Instructor for Anti-Christian Discrimination
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Rules ERA Proponents Missed the Deadline by About 40 Years

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

A federal judge ruled on Friday that the deadline for ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment has long since passed. 

Virginia became the 38th state to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment in Jan. 2020, giving the proposed amendment the bare minimum number of states needed to amend the Constitution. One small problem: the deadline for the proposed amendment came and went in 1982. 

Advertisement

(Via The Hill) 

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras in Washington, D.C., was a defeat for Illinois, Nevada and Virginia, which had lobbied the court to declare that the amendment should be added after Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it in 2020.

The three states sued in January 2020 to argue that Congress had no right to establish a 1982 ratification deadline for the ERA, but Contreras upheld the deadline.

“[A] ratification deadline in a proposing resolution’s introduction is just as effective as one in the text of a proposed amendment. Plaintiffs’ ratifications came after both the original and extended deadlines that Congress attached to the ERA, so the Archivist is not bound to record them as valid,” Contreras ruled.

The states have the option to appeal the ruling, and the issue could end up at the Supreme Court.

The ERA was written by two feminists, both radical and socialist, who first introduced the amendment back in 1923. It would already be part of the Constitution today if Phyllis Schlafly hadn't come along and pointed out all the terrible things that would happen to women under the proposed amendment.

Advertisement

The ERA would end all legal distinctions between the sexes. Once legal distinctions between the sexes were removed, Schlafly argued, women could be drafted into the military. Separate bathrooms for the sexes would be made illegal (leftists found a workaround with transgenders), men would compete in women's sports (again, the transgenders), and women's shelters would be forced to close down. 

Schlafly organized a conservative grassroots movement and stopped the ERA dead in its tracks. And they say one person can't make a difference. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement