Getting Reconciled to the Reality of Reconciliation
What Do You Think of the MLB's Decision on Pete Rose?
Trump Backs Ciattarelli: It's Time for New Jersey Republicans to Unite and Win
JD Vance Will Be the Nominee in 2028-- Mark My Words
The Most Fun Presidency Ever
An American Pope Confounds the Press
What Makes US-Israel Relations Special?
When the Whole World Is Upside Down
The Evil Scheme Behind the Spate of Anti-Trump Lawsuits
Pope Leo XIII Rejected Socialism and Defended Private Property
Trump Slams ‘Absurd’ Rise of Regulatory Crimes Undermining Rule of Law
NIH’s New Rule Is a Win for American Science
SCOTUS Must Stop Rogue Judges From Undermining Trump’s Policies
The Invasion You Can’t See: China’s Strategic Takeover of U.S. Infrastructure
SCOTUS Can Limit Birthright Citizenship
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Rules ERA Proponents Missed the Deadline by About 40 Years

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

A federal judge ruled on Friday that the deadline for ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment has long since passed. 

Virginia became the 38th state to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment in Jan. 2020, giving the proposed amendment the bare minimum number of states needed to amend the Constitution. One small problem: the deadline for the proposed amendment came and went in 1982. 

Advertisement

(Via The Hill) 

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras in Washington, D.C., was a defeat for Illinois, Nevada and Virginia, which had lobbied the court to declare that the amendment should be added after Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it in 2020.

The three states sued in January 2020 to argue that Congress had no right to establish a 1982 ratification deadline for the ERA, but Contreras upheld the deadline.

“[A] ratification deadline in a proposing resolution’s introduction is just as effective as one in the text of a proposed amendment. Plaintiffs’ ratifications came after both the original and extended deadlines that Congress attached to the ERA, so the Archivist is not bound to record them as valid,” Contreras ruled.

The states have the option to appeal the ruling, and the issue could end up at the Supreme Court.

The ERA was written by two feminists, both radical and socialist, who first introduced the amendment back in 1923. It would already be part of the Constitution today if Phyllis Schlafly hadn't come along and pointed out all the terrible things that would happen to women under the proposed amendment.

Advertisement

The ERA would end all legal distinctions between the sexes. Once legal distinctions between the sexes were removed, Schlafly argued, women could be drafted into the military. Separate bathrooms for the sexes would be made illegal (leftists found a workaround with transgenders), men would compete in women's sports (again, the transgenders), and women's shelters would be forced to close down. 

Schlafly organized a conservative grassroots movement and stopped the ERA dead in its tracks. And they say one person can't make a difference. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement